Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should we impeach?

Posted on 03/30/2002 2:25:38 AM PST by In veno, veritas

Bush recently signed an unconstitutional bill into law, CFR. With his quote of "but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions", he showed that he had foreknowledge of that fact. He blatantly endangered our rights and failed to keep his oath "to support and defend the Constitution". With all this in mind, I cannot think of one reason why we should not move for his impeachment. If anyone of you can think of one, please respond.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: bush; impeach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
I won't be hypocritical in moving to impeach Clinton and not Bush.
1 posted on 03/30/2002 2:25:38 AM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
LOL, that's funny! Go for it.
2 posted on 03/30/2002 2:30:44 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
You're a complete ass to compare Clinton to Bush in this way.
3 posted on 03/30/2002 2:30:49 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
It's a risky game he's playing, but he may well be defending the Constitution by bringing this before the Court--assuming they strike it down and thus it presents no danger--while gaining valuable elements that will remain valid afterwards, and warding himself from the inevitable pre-election squabble over who did what to "fix" politics. Or maybe the devil made him do it.
4 posted on 03/30/2002 2:36:15 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
Endangered our rights??????? We have a system of checks and balances for a reason...I am sure that if the SCOTUS finds it unconstitutional, then they will strike it down.

Furthermore, it was passed by both the House and Senate, so while it may be unconstitutional, I fail to how President Bush signing a law passed by Congress would qualify as High Crimes and Misdemeanors........

Also, I cannot recall the President every supporting McCain-Finegold, and not wanting to give the democRATS a potential campaign issue by not signing it, he may feel as though many do, that it won't survive a constitutional challenge in the Supreme Court....just my .02

5 posted on 03/30/2002 2:38:01 AM PST by BigFLPanhandleDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
First don't we have to impeach the Senate and House for voting for such a bill? Then let's impeach the President. I can get behind making McCain the first to go.
6 posted on 03/30/2002 2:41:27 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
Thankyou very much for the lovely comment, although you still haven't stated a reason.
7 posted on 03/30/2002 2:42:55 AM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BigFLPanhandleDude
"I fail to how President Bush signing a law passed by Congress would qualify as High Crimes and Misdemeanors........"

IMO, the whole lot of them ought to be impeached. The only thing they do is maneuver to retain their own power and raise as much money as possible. They've been violating their own oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution for years now.

Carolyn

8 posted on 03/30/2002 2:44:15 AM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
Before we tie Bush to a stake and burn him over CFR, lets see what the SCOTUS does with it.

But, I'm still not very happy he signed it.

It tells me he either is a VERY good politician or a President playing a very dangerous game with my Constitutional rights.

Either way, I don't like to be played with and I don't like politicians.

After all, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not being a politician.

Let's keep a little perspective

9 posted on 03/30/2002 2:47:37 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigFLPanhandleDude
Well, it already failed the first two checks. As a reactor operator, we are told never to rely on our interlocks to keep us safe. I am the first and foremost defense in keeping the reactor safe. I fail to see how his job is anyless important. It does qualify as a misdemenor, since it is an infraction of the supreme law of the land. Either which way, I thankyou for the comments.
10 posted on 03/30/2002 2:48:55 AM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CDHart
Aside from a select few(very few), I agree with you maam.
11 posted on 03/30/2002 2:50:01 AM PST by BigFLPanhandleDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I am also in support of that, however who would try them? Hopefully not themselves!
12 posted on 03/30/2002 2:50:06 AM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
And Thank You...

I do not deny that he knowingly signed an unconstitutional piece of legislation. Perhaps, as I said, he did not want to hand the Demi's their one campaign issue for the year. Since the Dem's claim that the majority of Americans support this kind of trash legislation(which I doubt), perhaps he thought to wash his hands of it, hoping, as his quote suggests, that the SCOTUS will give it the perennial double tap to the head

Of course the entire lot of them in D.C. could use a good thrashing

13 posted on 03/30/2002 2:57:00 AM PST by BigFLPanhandleDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
Of course if he really was opposed to it, perhaps he should have stood his ground and given it the veto pen. Either way the whole think stinks....
14 posted on 03/30/2002 3:01:25 AM PST by BigFLPanhandleDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
I am also in support of that, however who would try them? Hopefully not themselves!

Well you are asking Congress to impeach a President for signing a bill the Congress passed. I am holding my breath as we speak.

15 posted on 03/30/2002 3:02:39 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
So who's going to impeach him? The same Congress that voted for this bill?
16 posted on 03/30/2002 3:05:29 AM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
It's the job of the SCOTUS to determine constitutionality, and Bush knows this.
17 posted on 03/30/2002 3:08:55 AM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: In veno, veritas
Dumbass...
19 posted on 03/30/2002 3:42:47 AM PST by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDHart
IMO, the whole lot of them ought to be impeached. The only thing they do is maneuver to retain their own power and raise as much money as possible. They've been violating their own oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution for years now By God, you're right, let's get rid of all government, not just Congress and the President. Let's go for the state legislatures and county commissioners also. OR ...perhaps we could come up with something more intelligent to talk about.
20 posted on 03/30/2002 3:43:57 AM PST by Jefferson1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson