Posted on 03/29/2002 6:10:25 PM PST by goody2shooz
A patent was granted on March 26, 2002 for "The Motionless Magnetic Generator," MEG) US Patent 6,362,718, which is likely to become the first commercially available free energy device in history in about one year from now. The machine will provide free electricity from the vacuum, for the life of the device, which should be a very long life since it has no moving parts. You can see a picture of scientist Jean Louis Naudin's MEG replication model at:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm.
It has strong magnets, coils, and a controller unit with the electronics. Naudin made the announcement to the MEG-builder's Yahoo group. The announcement has significance since the patent office has always been skeptical of devices which seem to get-something-for-nothing." But according to the new science of scalar electromagnetics, the MEG does not break the law of conservation of energy. It's just that the energy is conserved in the fourth dimension, time, and not our 3-space world.
The MEG provides electrical energy by tapping the longitudinal electromagnetic (EM) waves which exist in almost infinite abundance in the vacuum of space. This ocean of energy which permeates everything is sometimes called the "zero point" energy, since it remains there even at absolute zero temperature.
Four inventors are listed: Stephen L. Patrick, Thomas E. Bearden, James C. Hayes, Kenneth D. Moore.
Tom Bearden has explained the operation of the MEG on his website Cheniere.org, and also speaks about the new fearful weapons that can and have been made using the same "longitudinal waves" of the vacuum.
The complicated physics of how the MEG works is explained in the paper "The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator: Extracting Energy from a Permanent Magnet with Energy Replenishment from the Active Vacuum," which can be found at Tom Bearden's website:
cheniere.org.(http://www.help4all.de/energy/MEGpaper.pdf>
The first MEG units to be produced for sale will output 2.5 kilowatts of free electricity. Forever. They should be in production about a year from now. Facilities for manufacturing the device are being set up in an unnamed "friendly nation."
This free electricity will flow indefinitely, without much, or any maintenance. The units may be hooked together to provide more wattage, so four of them would provide 10 kilowatts. After some production experience units will be made which output 10 kilowatts each. With a couple of those units a house could get off the electrical grid.
Tom Bearden, one of the inventors has said "I will admit that the chief scientist of an important experimental group in a large company was rather stunned at the type of output we were able to obtain. The MEG may look like just a transformer, but it is not. It is a completely different breed of cat." This cat, it would seem, is out of the bag now. The ordinary EM waves we are familiar with are called "transverse" waves, to distinguish them from the new "longitudinal" EM waves of the vacuum.
Bearden has explained in depth on his website cheniere.org that wherever there is a dipole (battery, generator, magnet) there is an unseen flow of longitudinal EM waves in that local vacuum, the only problem is in tapping that energy and "transducing" it to electricity. Bearden says that the problem with all the electrical circuits we have is that they are two-wire circuits, a loop by which half the energy goes back to destroy the dipole. In the MEG that closed loop is never made. So the dipole is not being destroyed.
Patents are not granted on devices which do not work, so in a sense this announcement proclaims a new era. The MEG device itself proclaims and proves that energy is bundantly available everywhere, for free. We only have to build the devices to tap it. MEG type devices could be put into a car with an electric engine to make a truly fuel-less automobile. Electricity can be available in very remote places. People will be able to get off our very terrorist-vulnerable power grids. In an era of terrorism a highly dispersed power system would be most desirable rather than our centralized systems.
What is somewhat astonishing to me is the discovery by Bearden et. al. that time itself is actually compressed energy, and that this free energy is actually coming from the time domain, the ocean of longitudinal EM waves which fill the empty vacuum of spacetime. In fact, time is energy compressed by the same factor that matter is compressed energy: the speed-of-light squared. Thus there is a new companion to Einstein's E=mc2. Can you say "E equals delta-tee-cee-squared?" The "tee" is time and delta-tee is change in time.
A company has been set up to manufacture the MEG called Magnetic Energy Limited.
The ramifications of free energy are enormous. The oil wars are not necessary. If we threw as much money at this technology as we are spending on the oil wars we would be free of the need for oil in less than a decade. With fuel-less cars air pollution will be greatly lessened. Third world nations can raise their standard of living eventually. And the energy is free. And it never runs out.
I have put together a kind of "Bearden for Beginners" article which explains some of the basic concepts of the current state of scalar technology.
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm
The granting of the MEG patent is the herald of the new era of scalar electromagnetics, and the free energy which flows forever and never runs out.
Bill Morgan wmorgan@nycap.rr.com
Hello there old-timer. This was in the 1960s or 70s. I saw several documents on it. It was a scam from beginning to end. The con-men who came up with it also claimed they were building a car based on the "Nobel Gas" (yes, that was the correct spelling) engine. I believe the actual name was [sic] "Nobel Gas Thermonuclear Engine" and the car was called the "Aerocar" or something similar. They were taking deposits for the "coming soon" car, and as I recall a couple hundred people gave them deposits.
A colleague of mine worked for Lockheed at the time and they got conned enough to send him to inspect the "working prototype". The inventors had scheduled a big show for their "engine". There was a huge explosion, probably conventional explosives. As I recall, nobody was injured. That was the end of the car and its "engine".
=======================
The U.S. Patent office stopped requiring working models circa 1976. The reason given: not enough warehouse space to store all the prototypes. Ever since then, it has been possible to obtain a patent on anything, no matter how crazy.
--Boris
If you "know for certain" it will work, that means you have proven the physics. You have equations that other people can understand, based on known physical laws.
You can explain it, clearly, with no bafflegab, to other people. Especially to engineers and scientists, who will be consulted by the Venture Capital people you approach with a business plan.
Or you could run into Tom Clancy at a funeral and talk him out of a million bucks. Gary Hudson (Rotary Rocket/Roton) did precisely that.
Where is Roton now?
--Boris
Never saw that episode. But here is something similar. Someone recently sent me a German patent on a device that reacted pure aluminum with water to get aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and hydrogen. The hydrogen gas is then burned conventionally in a modified car engine.
BMW actually tested the device. Works fine.
Except...Aluminum costs $0.70 per pound, roughly. When you do the economics, you find out that gasoline would have to rise to $12.00 per gallon before this concept was economically attractive. As I described it: "this invention is a very expensive storage battery. The energy is stored in the form of pure aluminum, and the battery is charged at the smelter, which uses huge amounts of electricity to create pure aluminum from rocks (ore)."
Nice try. Oh yeah, there was all that (heavy!) aluminum oxide sludge you had to keep disposing of, sort of like the ashes from your fireplace--only wet, dense, and icky.
--Boris
I can see where you'd want to retest everything. What an ugly new forum we have this morning!
Lots of people don't know the difference between technological change and physical laws. Technology changes like mad, but things like conservation of energy don't go away.
1) You can't win.
2) You can't break even.
Indeed, the Zero-Point Zanies strike again. There's a new one every few months.
At least in this case, there's a nod to something outside of known science to create the energy ("It's just that the energy is conserved in the fourth dimension, time, and not our 3-space world.").
FP
GT BME '82
GT MSME '85
Yes, and if I rob a bank, I'm really not stealing anything, because in the 4th dimension, they still have the money. I mean, they had it yesterday didn't they? No problem.
I decompress time all the time. Time for my nap.
I was going to look and see if they really issued a patent. I decided to watch Spongebob with my daughter instead.
P.S.
The other day was riding by the St. John's Church where (you) made (your) famous "Give me liberty, or give me death" speech. Pretty place. Well kept up; in continuous use.
Rule 2 is the second law of thermo.
Except for the E=mc2 exchange of energy and mass, there have been no well-documented violations of either. (You have anecdotal accounts, of course, but you have anecdotal accounts for UFOs, ghosts, and patriotic liberals.)
I'm pleased the church is still in use. But I thought the speech was given in the state (colonial) legislature. I could be wrong. I've taken his name, not his memories.
Interesting choice...either churches or taverns.
Maybe I need to address the specifics of fusion. Fusion reactions can yield a net energy. That doesn't violate conservation laws because your input material--let's say, hydrogen--has a lot of nuclear reaction potential. It's like an unburned fuel. When you fuse it to helium, it's lost some potential. By the time you've fused it to iron, it has no more nuclear potential at all.
What's going on is about packing fractions. Nucleons don't have the same mass in different elements. Iron, with a nucleus in the middle of the size range of the stable elements, has the smallest-mass nucleons. The mass difference between a proton in iron and a proton in hydrogen accounts for all the energy gained along the way.
Anyway, there's no infinite font of energy here. You realize a potential and then you have to go get some more fuel.
Your ping list works.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.