Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gc4nra
Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, if the funds would be applied to costs associated with fire arms by the government. They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest. Although I must admit a nickel a bullet is a tad extreame.
7 posted on 03/29/2002 2:14:12 PM PST by Brellium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brellium
Forget the nickel, that's the "camel's nose".

If crime is not magically stopped after the nickel tax, (It won't be, and Perata knows it as well as we do), then it will be even easier to raise the existing tax to fifty cents or five dollars a bullet.

And of course, possession of an "untaxed bullet" would be subject to mandatory minimum prison terms.

14 posted on 03/29/2002 2:17:31 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing,

Every tax is a bad thing. I'll never pay a tax on bullets until people take heed of Joslyn Elders' recommendation to make safer bullets.

20 posted on 03/29/2002 2:21:39 PM PST by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
Senator Don Perata is that you?
31 posted on 03/29/2002 2:30:08 PM PST by thepitts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
"Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing,"

Taxes on a Right is always a bad thing. Wake up.

50 posted on 03/29/2002 2:59:56 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
"...Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing..."

Then you won't mind the one cent per word tax that has just been imposed on you---please send your monthly tax payments to Jim Robinson.

56 posted on 03/29/2002 3:34:10 PM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
"They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest. "

Could you please interpret this sentence? I don't understand.

64 posted on 03/29/2002 3:57:00 PM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
"Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, if the funds would be applied to costs associated with fire arms by the government. They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest."

RIGHT! Sure. Consider this scenario...

"Leftennant! Who are these characters buying large amounts of amunition??? I don't recognize the name G.Washington... and who is this T. jefferson? Go out and arrest them... they must be planning something against His Majesty's government!"

94 posted on 03/29/2002 6:00:00 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Brellium
" Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, if the funds would be applied to costs associated with fire arms by the government. They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest. Although I must admit a nickel a bullet is a tad extreame."

Would you mind explaining what the hell you're babbling about?

161 posted on 03/31/2002 12:52:26 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson