Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
50 years ago, the incidence of breast cancer (Br. Ca.)was 1 in 13. Today it is 1 in 7.9. Yes, breast cancer has always existed.

But why the increase?

1)Decreased breastfeeding 2)Decreased family size and 3) Delay in childbearing have always been known to increase Br. Ca. incidence. Because they are independant risk factors, their relative increased risk is know. The increase in breast cancer is far beyond what can be explained solely due to 1)Decreased breastfeeding 2)Decreased family size and 3) Delay in childbearing.

Therefore, other factors must have come into play over the last 50 years.

Hundreds of studies have looked for a link to environmental toxins, pollution, chemicals, diet and fat intake, and NOT ONE OF THESE STUDIES has found a positive link.

However, 28 of 37 studies to dat, or 76%, have found a positive link between abortion and breast cancer. 80% of all studies to date have found a positive link between the pill and breast cancer.

Think about it...

Increase from 1 in 13 to 1 in 7.9 over 50 years!

No studies of pollution or diet or chemicals or even smoking reveal ANY LINK WHATSOEVER!

75% of abortion studies and 80% od pill studies show a positive link!

Where is the "junk science???"

It is in a government health bureacracy that Bush has failed to purge of militant Clintonian pro-aborts who do not want abortion rights to be jeopardized by this info going public.

The National Cancer Institutes' position is corrupt because it is biased by a militantly pro-abort agenda. That is where the true charge of junk science should be laid.

Those denying this link are blinded by their agenda. Period. Those trying to expose the link have the facts as well as the moral high ground on their side.

84 posted on 03/30/2002 12:35:30 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: proud2bRC
Decrease in breast feeding, number of children, and later age of first pregnacy now cause breast cancer ? You are one sick, obsessed puppy ! You keep looking for anything at all, ANYTHING, and you are sure to find it, since there is more damned junk science out there, than facts, which will mesh with your agenda. SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH !

All that you and this crap does, is to put back the stigma, that was not so long ago attached to anyone poor sou, who got cancer. Now, it isn't the dreaded disease, it's what you and your ilk decide to attach to HOW someone gets it. the fact is, they are still searching for that answer. Many things keep getting thrown out ; however, no, there hasn't ever been a definative study. NO ONE REALLY KNOWS !

The insidences, of breast cancer, which have been found in mummies, in Egypt, have NOT been all that carefully kept, throughout history. Many women did NOT even tell a doctor, in the 20th century, becuase either way, it was a death sentence. Of course, none of this matters to you. All you care about, is that NO woman should use nonRoman Catholic sanctioned birth control and have pregnancy after pregnancy, from as eraly an age as possible. Anything else is some sort of sin / crime to you, whether they are Catholic or not.

87 posted on 03/30/2002 12:57:43 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson