Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proud2bRC
Decrease in breast feeding, number of children, and later age of first pregnacy now cause breast cancer ? You are one sick, obsessed puppy ! You keep looking for anything at all, ANYTHING, and you are sure to find it, since there is more damned junk science out there, than facts, which will mesh with your agenda. SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH !

All that you and this crap does, is to put back the stigma, that was not so long ago attached to anyone poor sou, who got cancer. Now, it isn't the dreaded disease, it's what you and your ilk decide to attach to HOW someone gets it. the fact is, they are still searching for that answer. Many things keep getting thrown out ; however, no, there hasn't ever been a definative study. NO ONE REALLY KNOWS !

The insidences, of breast cancer, which have been found in mummies, in Egypt, have NOT been all that carefully kept, throughout history. Many women did NOT even tell a doctor, in the 20th century, becuase either way, it was a death sentence. Of course, none of this matters to you. All you care about, is that NO woman should use nonRoman Catholic sanctioned birth control and have pregnancy after pregnancy, from as eraly an age as possible. Anything else is some sort of sin / crime to you, whether they are Catholic or not.

87 posted on 03/30/2002 12:57:43 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
Decrease in breast feeding, number of children, and later age of first pregnacy now cause breast cancer ? You are one sick, obsessed puppy !

Geez! Ask any doctor anywhere anytime, and they will agree that these factors increase the overall risk of breast cancer. This has nothing to do with an agenda, its simply fact. Breast cancer used to be called "Nun's disease."

Why? Because nuns did not have babies, and it has been a medically known fact FOR CENTURIES that women who don't have babies get more breast cancer. Also, it has been known for at least 150 years that women who do have babies and do not nurse them, had a slightly increased risk. Likewise it has been known that the longer you wait, your risk increases.

For heaven's sake, stop making such a fool of yourself just because you disagree with my religion.

Facts are facts. They have nothing to do with my faith. Re read my post carefully. It is simple well established epidemiological facts that I am relating. Get a grip.

--Dr. Kopp

88 posted on 03/30/2002 1:13:24 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons
the fact is, they are still searching for that answer

The FACT is, the search is over, the answer is the pill and abortion, and because the answer is so diametrically opposed to accepted cultural "wisdom" and practice, NO ONE will admit to the obvious.

Besides the other obvious point...no one wants to ever admit that the RCC is right about anything.

Population control and the right to murder the innocent in the womb takes higher precedent in this culture of death than the right of women to fully informed consent.

But isn't that always the bottom line? The more women are "emancipated," "liberated," by hornonal human pesticides and surgical abortion, the more enslaved they become to sickness and death and heartbreak.

And for pointing out these truths, hidden by the mainstream media in their liberal bias, and mainstream medicine by their liberal bias...for this act you attack us?

Who really are the dangerous radicals here? And Who is just mouthing the propaganda of the liberal establishment?

89 posted on 03/30/2002 1:23:51 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson