Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity I need Help on Tarrifs Debate with Wacko Liberals -who can levy tarrifs ?
3-28-02 | Kay Soze

Posted on 03/28/2002 9:37:18 AM PST by Kay Soze

I am unclear on the tariff’s issues.

Does the president have the ability to post tariffs?

I understood ( US Constitution ) that congress was the only body with power to do such.

And as a side question after reading at The Heritage Foundation’s site on Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority - how could giving the executive branch TPA be constitutional?

But I really need to know if Bush can levy duties or tariffs on steel or Canadian lumber or do such actions originate with Congress and then rubber stamped by the Chief .

Thank you.

Keyser


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: constitution; tariffs

1 posted on 03/28/2002 9:37:19 AM PST by Kay Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
I am unclear on the tariff’s issues.
Does the president have the ability to post tariffs?
I understood ( US Constitution ) that congress was the only body with power to do such.
And as a side question after reading at The Heritage Foundation’s site on Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority - how could giving the executive branch TPA be constitutional?
But I really need to know if Bush can levy duties or tariffs on steel or Canadian lumber or do such actions originate with Congress and then rubber stamped by the Chief .

I asked this question after Bush declared the steel tariffs. Look at posts 35 through 38 in this earlier thread to read the responses.

In summary, as I understand it, Congress has passed a law delegating to the President the power to adjust or compute tariffs, although he is supposed to make the adjustments by following the policy set out in the law. The Supreme Court has ruled that this arrangement is Constitutional. (I gather it's viewed as akin to the executive branch issuing regulations that implement the laws passed by Congress.)

It seems to me that a good argument could be made that, in practice, the President has nearly complete discretion as to whether or not to order a tariff, and that therefore this is no longer a matter of merely implementing the law as passed by Congress; if this is the case, I think it would not be covered by the Supreme Court ruling. However, I am not a lawyer, and, unless the Supreme Court actually hears this argument and rules in favor of it, the current law stands. Congress has delegated this power to the President.

2 posted on 03/28/2002 9:54:01 AM PST by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: congressman billybob
fyi
3 posted on 03/28/2002 10:27:29 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson