To: rightwing2
There are libs on the Court, but it is not a liberal Court overall. They helped Bush into office, or did you forget? I still think that the CFR will prove wholly unacceptable on a strictly Constiututional basis. If I'm wrong, then the Republic is really in trouble. P.S. The no profanity rule is still in effect.
To: Paulus Invictus
Does anyone honestly think that a court, that has ruled restrictions on flag burning, the recent bill aimed at pornography on the web and not allowing the display of Christ in a jar of urine are violations of the 1st amendment, will not rule against this bill as well?
To: Paulus Invictus
There are libs on the Court, but it is not a liberal Court overall. They helped Bush into office, or did you forget? I still think that the CFR will prove wholly unacceptable on a strictly Constiututional basis. If I'm wrong, then the Republic is really in trouble. P.S. The no profanity rule is still in effect.
Yes, they voted to uphold the election since every single recount went Bush's way. How could they have done otherwise. If they had not done so, they would have plunged the country into constitutional chaos. However, "not a liberal Court overall?" Aren't we talking about the same court that found state and federal bans on partial birth aborton/infanticide to be constitutionally impermissable??? The Republic is in trouble all right and we have Bush to thank for it. There was no room for error or excuse on this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson