Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paulus Invictus
Does anyone honestly think that a court, that has ruled restrictions on flag burning, the recent bill aimed at pornography on the web and not allowing the display of Christ in a jar of urine are violations of the 1st amendment, will not rule against this bill as well?
174 posted on 03/28/2002 8:56:31 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Texasforever
I met an admirer of your's on another thread, today. He was a chip off the ol' block. He stopped short though, of telling me to take my rope and go home. This freeper admired your sharp, quick wit and the substance you add to your commentary. Too bad that both of you don't remember that there is supposed to be a "new tone" to the debate in DC and in the country in general since Bush got in the white house. I think that Bush would be sadly disappointed in both of you for the lack of a kinder, gentler tone with your opponents.
176 posted on 03/28/2002 9:08:47 PM PST by RamsNo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson