Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ravingnutter
The bill has a provisional clause, only the parts that affect the First Amendment will be thrown out. And yes, those parts will be dead.

A provisional clause telling the Supremes that they can only throw out part of the bill is probably itself unconstitutional due to separation of powers.

74 posted on 03/27/2002 1:11:09 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: angelo
To the contrary, my friend. This law contains a severability clause, and those are normally placed in all laws passed by Congress.

However, there are two routes to get the Court to throw out the whole law, not just part of it, despite that clause. I will pursue both routes in my brief to the Supreme Court.

Congressman Billybob

Click here to fight Shays-Meehan.

Click here for latest column.

91 posted on 03/27/2002 1:30:11 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson