As much as I hated it when the other side spun while Clinton was in office, I knew that I'd hate it even more when our own side did it under Bush. Well, I do.
I want to be on a side that actually gives a s--t about this nation. I guess that's just too much to ask these days, when the bars have been lowered to the point that it looks like we're in a limbo contest rather than talking about ideals that will make this nation the strongest it can be.
Raise the bars? The very idea... I should have my head examined. Bushbots will be by shortly to remind me.
Interestingly enough, they're using moral relativism and scary "My president right or wrong!" rhetoric. I thought thhose were the tools of the other side. My mistake.
It's really something isn't it?
I can remember a time, not all that long ago when someone with an argument like:
"Well, Bill Clinton isn't responsible for signing Unconstitutional laws. It's not his job to veto them. That's all for the Supreme Court to decide, Congress and the President have nothing to say about it."
would have been run out of here on a rail.
It's really dissapointing how some Freepers would gamble our Right's to keep their boy (and those in Congress who supported CFR, Dubya didn't do this alone. There is plenty of blame to go around.)from looking "bad" in the press for Defending our First Amendment.
It's so incredibly dissapointing.
I swear, it's like listening to James Carville himself.
And, if the SC screws up and doesn't throw it out.. (it has happened before)
Bet on a big "see, I told you so" party here on FR, to celebrate our loss of speech. They will actually be HAPPY if this makes it through the SC unhindered.
So long as it doesn't taint the golden child, then all is well.