Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman gets $300,000 in exorcism suit
Fort Worth Star-Telegram (a.k.a. "Startle-Gram") ^ | March 23, 2002 | By DARREN BARBEE

Posted on 03/23/2002 7:19:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP







Posted on Sat, Mar. 23, 2002



Woman gets $300,000 in exorcism suit


Star-Telegram Staff Writer

FORT WORTH - Six years after Laura Schubert sued members of a Colleyville church for trying to cast demons out of her, a Tarrant County jury's award of $300,000 filled her with joy.

Because of an earlier court ruling, jurors made their decision without hearing any religious aspects of the case, including Schubert's accounts of two exorcism attempts in 1996.

"This is a situation where religion went real bad," said Schubert's father, Tom Schubert, a former Assembly of God minister and missionary.

David Pruessner, an attorney for Pleasant Glade Assembly of God Church, said an appeal is likely. The pastor and some church members were found liable for abusing and falsely imprisoning Schubert, who was 17 at the time.

Pruessner argued that Schubert was suffering from a mental disorder and that church members didn't harm her.

"We are a Bible-believing, Pentecostal church. For this we make no apologies," pastor Lloyd McCutchen said in a statement. He will have to pay 50 percent of the amount awarded to Schubert. Former youth pastor Rod Linzay, his wife, Holly Linzay, and other church members were also found liable.

Schubert's lawsuit, filed six years ago, described a bizarre night in which church members anointed the sanctuary with holy oil, rapped on pews and propped a cross against the church doors to keep or drive demons out. But jurors heard none of that.

McCutchen, in his statement Friday, said the accusations are "outrageous and preposterous actions of which we are not guilty."

In 1998, the 2nd Court of Appeals in Fort Worth agreed with church attorneys that discussing the denomination's doctrine on demonic possession would violate the church's religious freedom.

Instead, jurors listened for three weeks as 49 witnesses sidestepped the religious aspects.

One juror, who did not give her name, said the judge informed the jury after the trial about the exorcism attempts. The juror said knowing those details would not have made a difference in the verdict. She did not elaborate.

The trial focused on two nights in June 1996 when Schubert said up to eight youth group members restrained her while adult church members watched.

"This was not a situation of prayer. They were trying to commit an exorcism on me," Schubert said.

Schubert, now 23, testified that the experience led her to mutilate herself and attempt suicide and finally to seek psychiatric treatment. Her lawsuit in 141st District Court in Fort Worth had sought more than $500,000.

In closing arguments Friday, church attorney Pruessner walked to a corner of the courtroom, sat on the floor and pulled his knees to his chest to demonstrate how Schubert had been seeking attention in June 1996. He said church members were only trying to help her.

"Laura Schubert breathes in attention the same way we breathe in air," Pruessner said.

Schubert also exhibited a pattern of overdramatizing events, he said. She endured the hardship of being uprooted while traveling with her missionary parents, Pruessner said. Partly because of that, Schubert developed a mental disorder, he said.

"Before she ever showed up at the church, she had a pre-existing personality disorder," Pruessner told the jury.

But Bill Wuester, Schubert's attorney, said the teen- ager was a model high school student who held a job, paid for her car and looked forward to her senior prom. That changed in June 1996, he told the jury.

"This girl had no problems. ... She had a great life," Wuester said.

He reminded jurors that church officials and youth group members testified that they had pinned her to the sanctuary floor.

Schubert and other witnesses testified that she had kicked and yelled to try to break free.

"I don't know how many times a woman has to say `no' before she is believed," Wuester told the jury. "How many times does she have to say, `Get away. Don't hold me. Let me up. No!' ?"

But Pruessner said no amount of money would improve Schubert's mental health.

The jury was being asked to "destroy the church and the people who have been sued," he said.

McCutchen, the pastor, said the verdict would not devastate the congregation.

"The church will go on," he said.

Darren Barbee, (817) 685-3818

dbarbee@star-telegram.com





© 2001 dfw and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.dfw.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: exorcism; legalsuit; pentecostalchurch
Exorcism suit? Hmm? Anyone have a picture of what an Exorcism suit looks like???..................

Easy Link
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/2919342.htm

1 posted on 03/23/2002 7:19:52 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
In 1998, the 2nd Court of Appeals in Fort Worth agreed with church attorneys that discussing the denomination's doctrine on demonic possession would violate the church's religious freedom.

Say what? This was a trial about an exorcism in which nobody was allowed to mention what was going on because it would violate the church's religious freedom?

3 posted on 03/23/2002 7:27:02 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
the jury heard nothing about that???

Man, I think the jury should hear the whole story. How can they make a decision when huge parts of the story are missing??

4 posted on 03/23/2002 7:31:49 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
the jury heard nothing about that???

Man, I think the jury should hear the whole story. How can they make a decision when huge parts of the story are missing??

I think that's par for the course. I was recently a juror in a drug dealing case. There were so many holes in what we were allowed to hear, that it made it impossible to come to a rational decision. The defendant had a few rocks of cocaine and was caught supposedly selling to some other people. Did they have any drugs or money? Dunno. Were they questioned? Dunno. Is this guy a know dealer? Dunno. Did any money change hands? Dunno. There were so many missing pieces of information that we couldn't do anything. We later found out all kinds of stuff that would have made our decisions a slam-dunk, but they were kept from us.

5 posted on 03/23/2002 7:50:54 AM PST by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
If a jury doesn't get the whole story they should refuse to convict, the prosecutors would get the point hopefully very quick
6 posted on 03/23/2002 7:52:21 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
It's amazing that one can still, in this day and age, call oneself a house of worship and get away with this kind of garbage. The leaders of this church should be in jail.
7 posted on 03/23/2002 7:54:55 AM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
That's what we did.
8 posted on 03/23/2002 8:31:06 AM PST by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sakic
So ... in "this day and age" you don't believe in the existence of demonic possession? I don't know if the gal in question was possessed or merely mentally unbalanced, but the Church acted in what they believed was her best interest. They may or may not have made a mistake. Your blanket condemnation of the church leaders is perhaps "unenlightened".
9 posted on 03/23/2002 8:35:43 AM PST by AngrySpud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
What's mindboggling that someone able to type still believes in "demonic possession". But I'm "unenlightened".
10 posted on 03/23/2002 9:44:54 AM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Say what? This was a trial about an exorcism in which nobody was allowed to mention what was going on because it would violate the church's religious freedom?

I was pretty confused by that part as well. Especially since it appears that the Church was the one pushing for the religious content to be excised. I'd think it would have helped their claim.
11 posted on 03/23/2002 9:52:11 AM PST by pragmatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
Sounds to me like some pretty atrocious lawyering

I don't know about that...

Schubert and other witnesses testified that she had kicked and yelled to try to break free.

Seems pretty open and shut, if true. She may be a wacko, all the money in the world may not help her, she may be overly dramatic, but that is irrelevent if the witnesses are correct.

13 posted on 03/23/2002 11:29:14 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson