Posted on 03/22/2002 7:55:50 AM PST by codebreaker
Great in depth article, Tom Burnett's wife also says that before getting on the plane September her husband was having 'visions' of varoius sites in Washingtom including the White House.
Burnett, a devout Catholic took it as a sign from God that he would be called on to somehow serve his country in the nations capital.
We actually agree on something! I started reading this thread because it bothered me the homosexuals were trying to make a big deal out of Bingham. They couldn't accept him for what he was on the flight, a hero. They had to mention that he was gay, and it was sickening they would exploit a national tragedy to get their agenda out there(and just as sickening in this thread that some would go the other way and exploit a national tragedy to get their agenda out as well).
I never did understand why they had to go further than him being a simple hero on the flight. His political beliefs and sexuality had nothing to do with what happened on that flight. You do not hear about any other passengers having their sexuality or political beliefs mentioned. The press doesn't care if somebody is hetero and Republican, but by God if they are gay, and even Republican, they have to shove it in your face.
he'll lose it because of people such as yourself who are running around preaching hate.
God has the final say in what is and what isn't sin.
While I consider homosexuality a sin, and while some don't, I do know that it is not the place of the government of the United States of America to dictate that homosexuality (not talking about sodomy, but homosexuality in general) is illegal, because that would come very close to the government intertwining with religion, and I do not want the government in my Church, nor do I want my Church in the government.
Go ahead and belittle this and throw in a bunch of fluff insults and don't address any substantial issues, like you've been doing.
Ignore what I'm saying in plain English, and try to read into things that can't be read into.
That's what I've come to expect from you all.
What Ive come to expect from you is only one-sided debate.
You have one more chance, all you have to do is go back and look for those little question mark thingys and the end of any number of sentences Ive written?
I know youre feeling really silly now because not one statement you made was actually correct and wish you had checked your assertions before you wrote these things. So Standing ready with high boots and towel firmly in hand.
I'm so sick of hearing about how normal, healthy, satisfying and desirable it is to be a pervert I could just puke. Homosexuals are criminals (As indicated by the fact that it is against the law in most states not to mention in the Bible) and they should be treated as such. They need to be encouraged to change their destructive life styles and by accepting them we continue to enable their destructive behavior. Now they want for us to tell our children its OK too and recommend they try it for themselves.
How many of our children do we have to lose before we get a clue that these folks are not good for our society? How much proof do we need? Then I get to talking to people who claim to be conservative and they are telling me that it's OK to be homosexual and it's ok to spread this perversion to our children as if it where normal and OK.
Well it's not OK and its not normal and we do not have to tolerate it in our homes or in public. Well historically homosexuals have been denounced and to be conservative is to support tradition and error on the side of caution. Throwing caution to the wind is not conservative in any way. We need to tell our government to uphold the law and question why they do not. Why they cannot understand what the law is, is beyond me. Why conservatives would fall for their lies is also beyond me.
Thanks for the encouragement though it was written in haste. It does address, to a very small degree, the differences between Liberaltarian Utopia and Conservative common sense society. Do we forego laws for; incest, bestiality, drug use, divorce, adultery, polygamy, vaccinations, polyandry, suicide, prostitution, self-mutilation, sodomy, gambling, pornography, voluntary euthanasia, surrogate mothers, jaywalking and obscenity or should we live in a society where the common sense of right and wrong isnt relative? I believe its addressed in States Rights and States Interest issues and as long as reserve the right for our local representative legislature to make that decision we can choose where to live and who to represent our best interests. Id love to hear your thoughts on it.
Thank you. KEEP SHOUTING FROM THE ROOFTOPS!!!!! We're behind ya, all the way!!!!
How exactly do you plan to "get rid of" homosexuals?
Are you back to promoting your death camp idea again?
Oh no.... of course not.
ROFL!!
"I get tired of being co-operative" --Tom Daschle
"I get tired of being honest." --Bill Clinton
"I get tired of being nice." --Khepera
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.