Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Keeping the powder dry until November...
1 posted on 03/19/2002 1:45:52 PM PST by mac_truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck
Within moments of his announcement, Romney was challenged on his stand on abortion, a hot-button issue in a state that recently has supported fiscally conservative, socially progressive governors.

He said he would support a woman's right to choose.

The correct way to report this is "socially liberal", because there is no cultural "progress" in anything "progressive".

3 posted on 03/19/2002 1:49:50 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
Another RINO bites the dust. I noticed from reading the end of the article that Mitt Romney's pro-choice. Considering he and whoever the Rat gubernatorial candidate turns out to be both endorse abortion, there's no one pro-life Massachusetts conservatives can vote for. As I said on another thread, getting a real conservative to run in a state swamped with Rats would be a miracle.
4 posted on 03/19/2002 1:50:27 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
To once again correct The New York Times, it should be noted that Jane Swift is an acting governor and has never actually been elected governor. So the NYT headline is misleading.
7 posted on 03/19/2002 1:52:43 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
Okay, sit there and tell me that governor didn't look just like Monica Blewinski.
11 posted on 03/19/2002 2:02:34 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
and a controversial decision not to commute the sentence of a convicted child molester.

Only in Mass would NOT commuting the sentence of a convicted child molester be controversial.

Does anyone know more about this? Why is this controversial?

19 posted on 03/19/2002 2:13:49 PM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
Great! I get to choose from a RINO or liberal demorat. Besides being a whimp-out on the abortion issue, I have heard from GOAL (MA gun lobby) that his gun rating was a D.

I am seriously voting for the Libertarian Carla Howell.

25 posted on 03/19/2002 2:38:28 PM PST by kickstart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
Five Democrats also are running for governor: Senate President Thomas Birmingham, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, state Treasurer Shannon O'Brien, former state Sen. Warren Tolman and Steve Grossman, a former national Democratic Committee chairman.

As usual, no mention of the real conservatives in the major media. I hope Carla Howell kicks their butts. ;-)

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Massachusetts tax repeal initiative gets certified by attorney general

A Libertarian initiative to repeal the Massachusetts state income tax and save Bay State taxpayers $9 billion a year has been officially certified for inclusion on the November 2002 state election ballot.

On September 5, state Attorney General Tom Reilly announced the "Small Government Act to End the Income Tax" had met state constitutional requirements for ballot inclusion.

Potential LP gubernatorial candidate Carla Howell, whose Committee for Small Government is spearheading the initiative, said she was pleased with the decision.

"We're excited that Massachusetts taxpayers will have the opportunity to vote for a key plank in the Libertarian platform," she said. "The Small Government Act will be a long overdue windfall for Massachusetts families."

If approved by voters, said Howell, the Small Government Act (SGA) would eliminate the state's current 5% tax on wages, the 5% tax on interest and dividends, and the up-to-12% tax on capital gains -- resulting in an estimated savings of $2,000 per year for the average taxpayer.

"[The measure is] probably the largest percentage slash in [state] government and taxation proposed in the United States since the end of World War II," she said.

However, Howell said getting the measure listed on the ballot will be no easy task.

Proponents of the SGA must collect 57,100 certified signatures of Massachusetts residents by December 1. At that time, the proposal will be submitted to the state legislature for consideration.

If the Democrats and Republicans in the legislature fail to act on the measure by May 2002 -- as Howell predicts they will -- Howell and her Committee for Small Government must gather another 9,517 signatures by July 5 to put the measure before the voters.

Although Howell said Libertarians should expect massive opposition to the SGA from pro-tax organizations, she is optimistic about the effort.

During the past 20 years, no tax cut initiative has garnered less than 39% of the vote in Massachusetts, she said -- and a "bold" initiative such as this one has the potential to excite citizens who feel overburdened by stifling taxation.

"Our Libertarian ballot initiative means an end to Massachusetts income taxes on hard-working individuals and families," she said. "Ending the state income tax is good for workers, good for families, good for communities, and good for the charities and churches who depend on us."

http://www.lp.org/lpnews/0110/sga.html

41 posted on 03/19/2002 3:08:01 PM PST by Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
Now this will be interesting if he wins. A Mormon in Massa.
63 posted on 03/19/2002 3:35:00 PM PST by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
Thank goodness! Now the choice is no longer the lesser of two evils! Goodbye, Swift you lightweight!

...er....

70 posted on 03/19/2002 4:28:40 PM PST by JAWs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mac_truck
It has been a long time, I'm sure someone from the Free People's Republic of Massachusetts will remind me...

When Mitt ran against Kennedy, I seem to remember that he was running pretty much to the right until the last couple weeks of the campaign. Then, suddenly, a left veer into abortion rights, "appropriate" gun control, minimum wage, and so on, and he lost big time.

It would be nice to see a conservative run and stick to the conservative philosophy, even if it means losing. I suspect Romney's swerve cost him the Senate seat.

I wonder if his "tolerant" opponents will bring up Mitt's Mormon faith? Kennedy (champion of diversity) did.

85 posted on 03/19/2002 6:39:00 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson