Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Times of London to charge for internet services
MediaGuardian.co.uk ^ | 3/18/02 | Owen Gibson

Posted on 03/18/2002 12:32:37 PM PST by GeneD

The Times has become the latest newspaper to admit it can't carry on giving away its web content for nothing with the announcement of a host of new paid-for services.

The newspaper will also start charging overseas visitors to access the site.

"The free ride is over and the days of free content have gone," said Paul Hayes, the general manager of Times Newspapers.

The move follows Pearson's announcement earlier this month that it plans to start charging users up to £100 a year for access to parts of the FT.com site.

Times Online will follow a slightly different strategy, charging separately for specific online services.

It already charges a subscription for its online crosswords and for access to its archives, and will soon start charging for access to law reports and a special World Cup section.

"The Times was the first UK publisher to recognise the value of online content. The internet offers strong commercial opportunities and we intend to take advantage of them," added Mr Hayes.

Other newspaper sites, most of which have already experimented with paid-for content, are expected to follow suit later this year by asking users to pay for content.

"We remain unimpressed by business models that will not deliver a return on our investments. Charging for content is not a new idea - newspaper publishers have been doing it for 200 years," said Mr Hayes.

Last year Times Online was given a complete overhaul, merging its two newspaper sites to save money and requiring users to register to access the site.

Anyone registered from overseas will now have to pay a subscription to access any part of the site.

However, Mr Hayes insisted that the 10 content "channels" culled from the daily paper will remain free to UK users.

In a move that could have implications for the BBC's desire to charge overseas visitors to access its sites, Mr Hayes insisted the site will employ technology that can identify a user's home country with over 90% accuracy.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: newscorporation; subscriptions; timesoflondon
I'm posting this because there seems to be a lot of news today regarding fee-based Web services, and because many Times of London stories appear on this site. A big boo-hiss to Rupert.
1 posted on 03/18/2002 12:32:37 PM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
The Times is going to discover how quickly they can lose customers to free news and commentary from elsewhere on the web. Then they will have ZERO revenue instead of some advertising revenue. I never did buy their papers before, and I never will. I never even read them before they were free, but now I guess I'll go back to the old way of not reading them at all. I'll certainly never pay them for something I can get elsewhere.

Ahhh....the marketplace.....even the marketplace of ideas, news and opinions. Best price, gentlemen. Best price.

And right now your best price is having me visit your site and see the advertising you have posted there.

2 posted on 03/18/2002 12:37:25 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Bummer.
But I've been paying for the online edition of the WSJ for years.
I'd rather pay for online editions like I do for deadtree editions: one payment for each paper, 50 cents or so.
I doubt if I'd buy a subscription when I probably won't read every day.
I will miss the Times of London.
3 posted on 03/18/2002 12:43:55 PM PST by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: expatriot
Well, it's worked fine for radio and television for years.
5 posted on 03/18/2002 12:57:24 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: expatriot
The subscription model sux for the internet. I occasionally read an FT article, but certainly not at 100 pounds a year. I have too many subscriptions and I try to cut them down. (No cable, no cell etc.. etc..) (I subscribe to a real time quote service and I have DSL, but only because there is a specific need and a compelling reason in both cases.)

Content providers are going to have to a go to something like 10 cents an article view via Pay Pal. Subscriptions are no good.

6 posted on 03/18/2002 1:03:57 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: expatriot
The subscription model sux for the internet. I occasionally read an FT article, but certainly not at 100 pounds a year. I have too many subscriptions and I try to cut them down. (No cable, no cell etc.. etc..) (I subscribe to a real time quote service and I have DSL, but only because there is a specific need and a compelling reason in both cases.)

Content providers are going to have to a go to something like 10 cents an article view via Pay Pal. Subscriptions are no good.

7 posted on 03/18/2002 1:04:16 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: GeneD
Remember when road maps were FREE at gasoline stations? The oil companies thought they had to give away maps to keep their customers. Then they discovered the truth.

The same thing will happen with the web.

The Electronic Telegraph and the Times both conducted market surveys recently presaging the intro of fees. Expect the Telegraph to join very quickly in the move to fees. Then expect many others, American as well as British, to follow.

I'll miss the free papers but companies have a limited tolerance for operations that simply bleed money.

10 posted on 03/18/2002 2:41:27 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I'll miss the free papers but companies have a limited tolerance for operations that simply bleed money.

=================

Unless, of course, it's Hollywood (or government service contractors) in which case it is a shrug of the shoulder and "Oh, well,it's just OPM." (other people's money)

11 posted on 03/19/2002 5:18:56 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson