Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/15/2002 6:22:07 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Mulder

2 posted on 03/15/2002 6:22:42 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
"clean shoot,"

As opposed to what, a dirty shoot?

3 posted on 03/15/2002 6:25:04 AM PST by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bang_list; Travis McGee; Darth Sidious;nunya bidness;coloradan;wardaddy;Squantos;harpseal
The cover-up continues.

I wounder if President Bush is "madder than heck" about this, like he was when one of his Royal Guards was kicked a commercial airliner?

4 posted on 03/15/2002 6:25:23 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: donut watch
"Clean shoot."

"You're either for us or you're against us."

"Don't worry about the FBI. Stay focused on your obligation to Anne Arundel County and you won't go wrong.'"

5 posted on 03/15/2002 6:28:45 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
"They say the office opinion on this case is, 'It's a good shooting,'" Hodgson told The Sun yesterday. "I said, 'Fine. If that's the case, the facts are going to come out and show that.'"

"Good shooting". Yeah, right up there with Randy Weaver's wife being shot in the head while holding her baby. And let's not forget about all the people who were gassed, shot, and run over by tanks at Waco. Apparently, a "good shooting" is when they get away with murdering innocent people. Oh, that's right, this kid isn't dead. I guess those other incidents were REALLY "good shootings". Here they just maimed an innocent person for life..

7 posted on 03/15/2002 6:34:10 AM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Perhaps they meant a "cleansed" shooting, where everyone* involved comes out of it sparkling clean.

*Everyone except for the poor lad who was shot. I'm sure the FBI rues the fact the lad survived this blast to the face.

Now that we've seen the picture of the victim, where's the picture of the trigger happy agent?

Perhaps he's a member of the "shadow government's" "shadow law enforcement" division.

9 posted on 03/15/2002 6:43:00 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
... (the victim's lawyer) was told by one of the agents: "There's no middle ground in this thing. You're either with us or against us."

No "middle-ground", eh, Agent? Circle the wagons?

Guess what, Agent.

We're law-abiding citizens here, and we're against you!

10 posted on 03/15/2002 6:43:32 AM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
How in the world could an innocent person being shot EVER be considered a clean shoot?
12 posted on 03/15/2002 6:43:55 AM PST by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
When will GW or Congress order a revamp of the FBI?

Since the days of clinton, the FBI has been out of control.

21 posted on 03/15/2002 7:23:01 AM PST by antidemocommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Reposting my comment from this thread...

For review purposes, let's go over the list of crimes, mistakes, poor condict, and hubris in this small event. I know I'm being "reckless" in doing so, but I still think it's important.

Those who are properly trained in the use of firearms do not rest their finger on the trigger, nor do they allow the barrel to point in any direction that might be unsafe. Those who refuse treatment suspects (and some reports mention gloating about it) deserve to lose their job entirely.

The three major points here:
1. The laws of the land should apply to all citizens equally. If any of us had mishandled a firearm during a gunshow or at home (or any acceptable reason to have a weapon drawn, just like when a pursued perp has shown a weapon)... and someone got shot in the face... then we would be in jail, facing fines, and would certainly be fired if handling of the firearm was a part of our job (like a salesman or instructor).

2. The FBI needs to stop covering their agents' crimes. They serve the public. The FBI should be open and honest when mistakes happen, and should demote, prosecute and fire agents when merited.

3. The FBI needs to ensure that those who need medical attention get it as soon as possible, whether they are suspects or not. The teacher at Columbine died and the kid in this story could have died because they are not willing to perform the same tasks that local officers and firemen do every single day: go into an area to try to save a life, even if an element of risk exists. (I'll refrain from using the WTC as the basis of comparison, again to be as accomodating as possible in my arguments.)

Rather than serve the public with truth, honor, and self-improvement, the federal agencies (as well as Congress) prefer to lie, obfuscate, 'CYA', and show their disdain for the opinions and welfare of the public. The icing on the cake: the annual demand for more of our hard-earned dollars so they can 'do more'. Boys, we ain't gonna put up with it much longer.

23 posted on 03/15/2002 7:26:15 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Mulder....

I would hope that Bush would be "furious" about this sad affair, however, I doubt it is of any concern to him. I have seen nor heard of anything from Ashcroft either. Now is the time to charge the man with manslaughter, let the chips fall where they may. Of course this will never happen.

25 posted on 03/15/2002 7:35:02 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
bttt
34 posted on 03/15/2002 7:54:14 AM PST by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Federal officers, failing to use felony stop proceedures utilized by most all law-enforcement, shot an unarmed, innocent, eagle scout in the face at point blank range with an assault weapon, and argue that this was a 'clean shoot' and reply to investigations into the matter with "There's no middle ground in this thing. You're either with us or against us."

What country is this?

And if this is representative of the mindset of FLEAs, they had damn well better be ready for the 'Unintended Consequences' ...

39 posted on 03/15/2002 8:15:01 AM PST by spodefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
"There's no middle ground in this thing. You're either with us or against us."

Well, that's fair enough

Just hope all the FBI supporters out there understand who made this rule

I know EXACTLY where I stand and this arrogant over-armed a$$hole is not on my side of the fence.

40 posted on 03/15/2002 8:15:19 AM PST by Lloyd227
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder

RULE 308!


48 posted on 03/15/2002 9:36:44 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Where are you John Ashcroft?!?!?! Another FBI murder of an innocent citizen has now blossomed into a coverup with OTHER FBI agents openly intimidating investigators. Where are you, you God fearing man? Maybe you should write another nice little song about eagles and patriots and teach the FBI to sing it.
51 posted on 03/15/2002 9:57:31 AM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
****Hodgson said that Wichner warned him that he would "end up looking pretty silly" once the shooting was ruled justified. In the call from Ellis, Hodgson said, he was told that he would be blocked from social interaction with his former FBI colleagues and friends if he worked on this case. Hodgson said it was Ellis who warned, "There's no middle ground on this thing. You're either with us or against us." ****

So it's the FBI against half the American people is that it agent Hodgson? It'd be more than half if they ever actually knew how you all murdered this kid and danced around his innocent bleeding body. You phucking scum! You traitor! You and those like you in the FBI are nothing but gubmint goons. Jack booted thugs. You are the dogs of Animal Farm and may God damn you to eternal hell. (Unless you repent of course. Fat chance.)

55 posted on 03/15/2002 10:14:21 AM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Dudley F.B. "Butch" Hodgson...

I think this is the same FBI agent, "Butch" that was in our Moto Guzzi Club - used to ride with him.

Must suck to defend the indefensible.

57 posted on 03/15/2002 10:19:52 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
If the victim had not been CAUCASIAN, either heads would have rolled or there probably would have been an all out riot. If people riot in defense of fleeing criminals, a fortiori in defense of an eagle scout.
62 posted on 03/15/2002 10:55:45 AM PST by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
I am sure the FBI opposes a inquiry to the shooting. The jack booted thugs do not want the possibility of being charged with murder.
63 posted on 03/15/2002 10:58:28 AM PST by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson