Naw, I'm too busy expecting lots of casualties from Afghanistan now, and Iraq in 1990.
The chinese have never successfully orbited in space, they have a few big blunders to make first. They are just making one huge bottle rocket.........BOOM!
Anyone who has dealt with chinese tech knows it is of very poor QC. They may be able to dominate the sneaker market. Nobody concerns themselves with the quality control of $10.00 tennis shoes. But customers willing to spend billions on space hardware would not touch chinese tech with a ten foot pole. They hardly have the concept of a 'clean room' for any manufacturing process in that country.
They tried to liscense building russian fighters once and had to send the finished products to Russia in order to 'fix' them so they could fly.
If they use it for the military, we could burn it up on launch with our laser equiped 747's. But the NWO types would be really unhappy with that action.
The CZ-5-5.0 heavy launcher would use the 5.0 m core stage together with a number of modular 2.25 m or 3.35 m diameter stages as strap-ons. Maximum payload with four 3.35 m diameter strap-ons is given as 23 tonnes to low earth orbit or 11 tonnes to geosynchronous transfer orbit. Lower payloads could be achieved by using 2 x 2.25 m plus 2 x 3.35 m strap-on stages; four x 2.25 m strap-on stages, or two of either stage. Growth to 40 tonnes payload would be possible if eight 3.35 m strap-ons could be used. The CZ-5 core stage is similar in dimensions and mass to the Ariane 5 core, but powered by four engines instead of the single engine used in Ariane.
Great Expectations!!!
Who cares that China has over a billion mouths to feed?
Let 'em squander their resources on the moon.
Been there, done that.
Nothing up there but a gigantic, barren rock.
If the Chinese can figure out how to eat it, let 'em have it.
This is just a wish list of things the US is doing or has already done. The fact is the space program no longer drives research and technology the way it once did. The glass cockpit in the Space Shuttle was derived from commercial airliners fer cryin' out loud, and corrupt senators get joy rides in the name of "medical research." NASA is simply shrinking to its proper size -- reflecting the reality of what we can efficiently get out of it versus what we get out of other research programs for the same amount of money.
And as far as China goes, it would be much better for them if they dropped their totalitarian government and shared in the technological wealth of the free world rather than reinvent the wheel forty years after the fact.