Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

100,000 People Perished, but Who Remembers?
The New York Times ^ | March 14, 2002 | HOWARD W. FRENCH

Posted on 03/14/2002 8:01:56 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy

From the housewives who cart home their groceries by bicycle, to the tiny shops and simple homes, Sumida Ward's irregular grid of narrow, gently bending streets appears at first glance to have gone unchanged for many decades.

But because 57 years ago this week a fleet of American B-29 bombers dropped 1,665 tons of napalm-filled bombs on Tokyo, leaving almost nothing standing over 16 square miles, there are few places in Japan where appearances like these could be more deceptive.

In one horrific night, the firebombing of Tokyo — then a city largely of wooden buildings — killed an estimated 100,000 people. In the spring and summer of 1945, similarly devastating raids on over 60 Japanese cities occurred before the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki brought World War II to an end.

Despite the huge toll, the firebombing of Tokyo left surprisingly few traces in the popular memory of Japanese, or Americans.

"When I go to speak to schools about what happened, the students just stare at me blankly," said Hiroshi Hoshino, a hale, silver-haired survivor of the destruction who still lives in the Sumida Ward neighborhood where his family lost everything. "Of course, everyone knows about the atomic bombings, but many people are not aware of the napalm attacks at all."

Only recently has Mr. Hoshino, now 71, banded together with other survivors to devote what he says will be the rest of his life to preserving the memory of the people killed in the March 10, 1945, bombings.

Incinerated, trampled and suffocated, people died on the very first day of the incendiary campaign in considerably greater numbers than were killed in Nagasaki. Yet in contrast to the annual memorials to the nuclear victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the anniversary of the Tokyo attack passes almost unnoticed.

This year, $800,000 in private donations enabled the victims to open a small museum last weekend.

There are many reasons why the American firebombing campaign has received so little attention. Japan's cities were incinerated after similar Allied firebombing of German cities, whereas the atomic attacks even now remain unique in history. Moreover, for Japanese, the atomic explosions subtly reinforced feelings of wartime victimhood and righteousness, making the Hiroshima and Nagasaki victims important symbols to mourn.

Almost yearly, leading Japanese politicians risk diplomatic incidents with neighboring countries by publicly honoring the country's fallen soldiers.

Yet apart from the atomic bomb victims, almost nothing has been done to honor Japan's civilian dead, partly because this might raise awkward questions about Japanese leaders during the war and partly because of the avid pursuit of friendship with America after 1945.

"Until the San Francisco Treaty in 1952, Japan was under control of the occupation forces, and when they arrived, they applied media restrictions, saying that one should not report things which reflected negatively on the United States," said Shinichi Arai, a historian who has written a comparison of European and Japanese civilian bombing. Later, as the country formed a close alliance with the United States, he said, "we were too busy trying to rebuild our country, and trying to forget the past."

For Japanese leaders, remembering the firebombing victims could mean explaining things like the deliberate placement of war industries in dense residential areas, or the prolongation of the war for many months after its outcome was clear — topics that even now have rarely been discussed here.

For Americans, it would raise questions about the prosecution of the war according to standards that Washington had long denounced as inhuman. "With the firebombings, we crossed the line that we had said was clearly beyond the pale of civilization," said John Dower, a leading American historian of Japan at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "The American reaction at the time was that they deserved it. There was almost a genocidal attitude on the part of the American military, and it extended to the American public."

Like many other survivors, Mr. Hoshino has little time for historical debate. He focuses on still vivid recollections of his terror at age 14, hearing the shrill air-raid sirens, then, minutes later, seeing a horrible red glow light the sky.

His father was dead and his older brother away at war. Mr. Hoshino tried to lead his mother and sisters to safety, first to a shelter he had dug himself in their yard, and then, as his neighborhood began to go up in flames, through teeming streets.

"My family survived because we ran and ran, until my mother couldn't run anymore," he said. "The place we stopped to rest was an open lot near the river, and somehow the fire never reached us there."

The next day, when his eyes had recovered enough from the heat and smoke to allow him to see, Mr. Hoshino's strongest memory is of the Sumida River thick with bodies.

Ikuyo Misu, 77, a member of Mr. Hoshino's recently founded neighborhood bereavement association, began to cry as she recalled how she had fled the spreading blaze, but was separated from her younger brother, whom she never saw again.

"Ever since then, there have been parts of Tokyo I can't bear to visit," she said. "The next day, the bodies were splayed on the ground everywhere you looked, just like mannequins, but blackened. You couldn't tell male from female."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bombing; japan; worldwarii; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
Here is another reason that the Japanese don't want to remember this - it further justifies the use of atomic bombs by the U.S. against Japan.

The Japanese refused to surrender. There was no question that they had lost the war. We firebombed every major Japanese city and still they refused to surrender. It was only after we had dropped our SECOND atomic bomb with the threat of endless more that they finally surrendered.

The Japanese were much like the muslim fanatics that we are at war with today. Now Japan is an ally. There is a lot to be said for bombing a fanatic culture into oblivion.

1 posted on 03/14/2002 8:01:56 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Who remembers the rape of Nan King? I bet the Chinese do.
2 posted on 03/14/2002 8:06:40 AM PST by cactmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Do you consider fighting to the death at the Alamo an honorable thing, or a fanatical thing?
3 posted on 03/14/2002 8:13:38 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
I once met a survivor of the Tokyo raids. She was a young girl at the time; had to go for water the next day across a bridge covered with the dead. Her attitude now? Japan started the war, waged a dirty war in China and elsewhere, and reaped the whirlwind. Moral: don't start wars, and fight them cleanly if you get into one.
4 posted on 03/14/2002 8:14:31 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
uh, both?
5 posted on 03/14/2002 8:15:02 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
The Japanese shouldn't have started the fight.
6 posted on 03/14/2002 8:17:19 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
After things like Pearl Harbor and the Bataan Death March, what kind of attitude was the American military and public supposed to have about the Japanese?
7 posted on 03/14/2002 8:20:09 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Let us also remember that after the first atomic bomb was dropped, the Japanese did not immediately surrender is further proof of their irrationality at the time. Here you had the strongest industrial power in the world prove to you that they have a doomsday weapon and the willingness to use it, and still they thought they could force us to terms by making the thought of American casualties in an invasion unacceptable.

Also remember that even after Nagasaki it took a tie-breaking vote by Hirohito to surrender. Yeah, there's lots about the war they want to forget.

NaW.
(And I like Japan, Germany and Italy so much better now than when they were totalitarian dictatorships...)

8 posted on 03/14/2002 8:20:55 AM PST by SodiumWarthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Well, an obvious dart at the US war plan to defend itself against enemies, by threatining the use of nuclear weapons to defend itself.

Well, ask a survivor of Bataan or Corregidor about the Japanese.

It was total war. The only thing the Japs understood was force, kinda like Hitler.

US Marines took 12,000 casualties on Iwo Jima, and the US did NOT falter. Why would we deviate from protecting ourselves in this day and age?

The Slimes is a putrid kitty-box liner

9 posted on 03/14/2002 8:23:56 AM PST by GoredInMich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Is fanatically honorable good or bad, or does it depend on whose side one is on?
10 posted on 03/14/2002 8:23:59 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cactmh
The ChiComms have a long memory and will repay Japan for its atrocities one day.
11 posted on 03/14/2002 8:26:09 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Or, since the Japanese empire was/had crashed and impotent, we could have easily (easy in 1945) blockaded the island and let them whimper into inertness...without dropping those bombs. We had 'em surrounded. By '45 their air force was down, their navy sunk, and their army hiding in caves.
...'course 'muricans don't think that way. Not then. (Not later at Waco.)
Oh yes, if we'd built a fence around 'em, prison like, and let them figure-out how to feed themselves, McArthur wouldn't have had a job.
12 posted on 03/14/2002 8:26:26 AM PST by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Mexico obliterated the Alamo's defenders, and would have obiterated all of Texas had they the resources.
13 posted on 03/14/2002 8:28:10 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Is fanatically honorable good or bad, or does it depend on whose side one is on?

It depends on whether you attacked the side which ended up who kicking your a$$.

I'd make a point Nanking or sideing with the Nazi's but I'd rather not have to explain myself.

14 posted on 03/14/2002 8:28:59 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
but many people are not aware of the napalm attacks at all.

Because they weren't napalm attacks. Incindiary bombs were used, and napalm is an incindiary device, but it was not used for the massive firebombings that levelled so many cities during the Second World War.

15 posted on 03/14/2002 8:29:28 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SodiumWarthog
More selective memory from Japan. High school textbooks glaze over the Japanese Army's criminals acts in China and Korea.
The Japanese militarists knew the war was lost after the Battle of Midway but continued fighting anyway.
16 posted on 03/14/2002 8:29:40 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: AzJP
You mean the same approach that we're using on North Korea and Iraq? We would still be fighting WWII if we used that strategy.
18 posted on 03/14/2002 8:30:41 AM PST by mbynack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GoredInMich
Kudos. You said everything I had in mind, and said it well. I don't give a damn what the Japanese think -- or The New York Times.
19 posted on 03/14/2002 8:31:12 AM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
In your great way of stating what should be obvious, but isn't to fuzzy minded liberals, you posted:

The Japanese were much like the muslim fanatics that we are at war with today. Now Japan is an ally. There is a lot to be said for bombing a fanatic culture into oblivion.

Not a single Japanese fanatic, who was killed on a Japanese ship, sub, plane, on the ground, in a cave, in a tank or in Japan ever hurt another innocent person.

Not a single Japanese Fanatic leader killed during WWII or executed for war crimes ever hurt another innocent person!

This is the only way to handle the current Islamic Fanatics, kill all of them and their financial backers!

Give peace a chance by killing all who would kill us! In spite of what the liberals and the others would try to have us believe, dead terrorists harm no one. If dead terrorists can't harm us, then kill all of those still alive! The formula is simple. It worked in WWII and will work now!

20 posted on 03/14/2002 8:31:24 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson