Israel has the right to the land because of all of the archeological evidence. That is reason, No. 1. Absolutely not. This line of reasoning means few or no one owns anything today. And if you do think you own land, new "archeological" discoveries may negate your claim. Israel won the land fair and square in a war. That is enough claim right there.
Absolutely not. This line of reasoning means few or no one owns anything today. And if you do think you own land, new "archeological" discoveries may negate your claim. Israel won the land fair and square in a war. That is enough claim right there. Then move on to the next point.
Based on your logic, who *would* own the area now known as Israel?