Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buying and Selling [ White Babies $35,000...Black Babies Only $4,000 ]
ABC News Website ^ | 3-12-02 | Dean Schabner

Posted on 03/12/2002 1:26:04 PM PST by antaresequity

 

 When a couple seeking to adopt a white baby is charged $35,000 and a couple seeking a black baby is charged $4,000, the image that comes to the Rev. Ken Hutcherson's mind is of a practice that was outlawed in America nearly 150 years ago — the buying and selling of human beings

The practice, which is widespread among private adoption facilitators, of charging prospective parents different fees depending on the race or ethnicity of the child they adopt is one that Hutcherson is fighting to change from his Redmond, Wash., church. The Antioch Bible Church has established its own adoption agency, and is lobbying state legislators to change Washington's laws.

"I've got championship Rottweilers. I sell them by supply and demand," Hutcherson said. "I raise thoroughbred racehorses. I sell them by supply and demand. I'm not going to let people sell children by supply and demand. What's the difference between that and slavery?"

The campaign to change the law is directed at Washington state legislators, but Hutcherson said he would prefer to see the federal government step in and create one set of regulations governing adoption, rather than leaving the issue to the states to decide.

Current Washington law bans payments to a birth mother for placing a child for adoption, but does not address payments for arranging an adoption or the fees that may be charged.

"I think it's an issue that Americans have not looked at closely enough, because if they had, things wouldn't be the way they are," he said.

He hopes to get attention around Washington with a billboard campaign as soon as he can raise the $70,000 to $80,000 he needs. The billboards will feature a white baby, a latino baby and a black baby and next to each, the fees some adoption facilitators might charge for them: $35,000, $10,000 and $4,000.

He said that besides putting a price on children, the practice discriminates against white babies and people who seek to adopt them — an issue he said has been overlooked because white people, particularly those who can afford the high adoption fees charged, are not used to considering themselves victims of discrimination.

"I know about discrimination," said Hutcherson, who is black. "I don't care who it's against, it's wrong. Tell me that if it was black babies that cost $50,000 and white babies that cost $4,000, people would be screaming their heads off."

More


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adoption; discrimination; noteworthy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-168 next last
To: glory
ping for later
61 posted on 03/12/2002 2:33:32 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: antaresequity
I adopted my son in '74 and my daughter in '78. The cost to me, for lawyer's fees, was $250 and $500, respectively. Even then adoptive children were "scarce". It seems to have gotten exponentially more difficult to adopt. I think the "white" baby adoptive cost may be skewed because many of these are now international adoptions from Eastern Europe (my perception from knowing what a couple of young women who worked for me had to go through).
63 posted on 03/12/2002 2:37:10 PM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
How much for an 18 year old Swedish chick?

A lot cheaper to get one than to get rid of one when she gets older.

64 posted on 03/12/2002 2:37:48 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
"Buying and Selling [ White Babies $35,000...Black Babies Only $4,000 ]"

Why? Supply and Demand? Racisim? Or is it just because the aliens want it that way??? Someone please explain!

65 posted on 03/12/2002 2:37:58 PM PST by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
Well, it's sad and sick. But, there will always be moron a**holes.
66 posted on 03/12/2002 2:38:13 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: another cricket
I have an idea. How about having an adoption draft?

Parents that pay the most get first pick. ;)

68 posted on 03/12/2002 2:39:55 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Harley - Mississippi
I believe that the stats refer to domestic adoptions, thus adoptions from Russia or Korea would not factor in. I've heard that some domestic adoptions (of healthy white infants) can be more costly than foreign adoption.
69 posted on 03/12/2002 2:43:06 PM PST by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BubbaJunebug
Perfect and succint summary!

Volume-priced, and with a limited customer base. Black babies make up a much higher percentage of the adoption population than the percentage of blacks in the overall population, which is higher than the percentage of blacks in the adoptive-parents population. (google-searching for the exact numbers...) While not every adoption is monochromatic, they are by far the majority. (I'll try to find the number of black families that adopt white children, but I don't recall ever seeing that breakdown)

70 posted on 03/12/2002 2:52:29 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
One factor in adoption is that quite often they can not place a child across racial lines. A black baby must go to a black parent; an American Indian child is considered the property of the tribe and will not be placed with a non-Indian family.

Too strong a liklihood that a black child who is adopted by whites will become successful and conservative. If this happened only rarely, it wouldn't be a problem, but if there were very many successful black conservatives it would no longer be possible for the media to deny that such people exist.

71 posted on 03/12/2002 3:02:41 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dead
Not true. Our family has four adopted black babies, and we have been called to take babies for free on a number of occasions. It always bothers me that prolifers do not adopt in much greater number than the general population
72 posted on 03/12/2002 3:11:06 PM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
You are absolutely right. White skin is prized. I have seen people walk over a black adoption to adopt a somewhat broken white baby.
73 posted on 03/12/2002 3:13:15 PM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
One factor in adoption is that quite often they can not place a child across racial lines. A black baby must go to a black parent;

Children can be placed across racial lines and have been for the past twenty years. This has been prolife white america's shield from facing their dereliction of duty, in my opinion.

74 posted on 03/12/2002 3:14:55 PM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
White people want white kids.
75 posted on 03/12/2002 3:15:55 PM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
Do what the smart Purchasers do and design your own to spec. That way no "real people" are discriminated against and it's just a bunch of "Excess" folks leftover.

You know ... the sorts our President purchases "already been killed" for his ever-Hopeful ESCR program.

76 posted on 03/12/2002 3:16:56 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Dont bet on the ocean protecting their child. I have run into more overseas adopted children who have decided to go back to their country of origin to live. Aside from the guilt when being picked whild others die.
77 posted on 03/12/2002 3:17:51 PM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
All they have to deal with now is the ignorant morons who see them out with their kids and say stupid shit like, "Oh....pity you couldn't have children of your own." They do have one biological child, BTW, but being staunchly pro-life, when it came to having other children, they decided to walk the walk and adopt unwanted children.

They have also been at the receiving end of some stupid racist comments for having a "mixed" family

Sounds like people who are walking the walk. Never, ever go through the state in an adoption. Always go to agencies.

78 posted on 03/12/2002 3:20:35 PM PST by mlmr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dead
How much for an 18 year old Swedish chick?

To buy or rent?

Wow, I can't believe I said that. If you're reading this I must've had the nerve to hit "post reply."

79 posted on 03/12/2002 3:20:47 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Descrimination is fine. Prejudice is stupid.

I'm a computer programmer. Every time I type the word "IF" I am telling a program to discriminate. Discrimination is a VERY GOOD THING. Sometimes it is improperly exercised, but that is a different subject altogether.

80 posted on 03/12/2002 3:24:40 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson