Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FresnoDA
SDPD will have a lot of e'splaining to do on this one.....

It seems to me that this jibes almost perfectly with your theory that there is more to this case than meets the eye. From all the reports we've seen [Danielle's blood in Westerfield's motor home, child porn on Westerfield's computer, Westerfield's inability to account for his whereabouts beginning at exactly the time - 9:30AM Friday morning - that the Van Dams discovered Danielle missing], the SDPD and the DA have more than enough evidence to nail Westerfield. The only possible reason these detectives would want to re-interview Westerfield is that they don't believe he's the perp - or that they suspect that he was not working alone.

12 posted on 03/08/2002 8:35:13 AM PST by SlickWillard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SlickWillard
One of the threads (I forget which)had an article that quoted westerfield's attny as saying that child porn was not found on the puter..but they did find explicit photos of minors/adolescent.. I forget the exact wording. I'd say that the pics are still child porn--what else could they be called?.
15 posted on 03/08/2002 8:41:09 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson