Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SlickWillard
One of the threads (I forget which)had an article that quoted westerfield's attny as saying that child porn was not found on the puter..but they did find explicit photos of minors/adolescent.. I forget the exact wording. I'd say that the pics are still child porn--what else could they be called?.
15 posted on 03/08/2002 8:41:09 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"I'd say the pics were still child porn...what else can they be called"?.

So, Kim, you have passed judgment without SEEING the pictures, based on hear-say, rumor and inuendo?

Bad move, Kim...ROFLMAO

sw

23 posted on 03/08/2002 8:59:52 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'd say that the pics are still child porn--what else could they be called?.

Apparently the "actors" were not clearly under the age of 18. It seems that it was difficult to determine.

While I find all pornography disgusting, it may be that DW did not know it was child porn. If the age was hard to tell, he may not have willfully broken the law.

Furthermore, it doesn't appear that he had a thing for real young girls as far as the porn evidence indicates.

24 posted on 03/08/2002 9:01:33 AM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson