Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cold fusion ‘breakthrough’ heralds clean nuclear power
The Sunday Times (UK) ^ | March 03, 2002 | Jonathan Leake, Science Editor

Posted on 03/02/2002 4:54:40 PM PST by aculeus

NUCLEAR scientists will this week announce they may have achieved a controlled form of cold fusion, a technology that potentially offers humanity a limitless source of clean energy.

The researchers are to publish evidence suggesting they have successfully fused the nuclei of hydrogen atoms, so recreating the processes that take place within the sun.

Until now the only way to achieve fusion has been through nuclear weapons or in vast experimental machines that cost billions of pounds. Both depend on generating extremely high temperatures.

However, the latest research, by scientists at the American government’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the University of Michigan, was done on a laboratory bench using relatively simple and cheap equipment at room temperature.

The study echoes the work of Professor Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons who, in 1989, announced they had achieved cold fusion at Southampton University but were ridiculed when no one could repeat their work.

Fleischmann and Pons made what many now see as a fatal mistake when they released their results at a press conference rather than having them scrutinised by other scientists before publication in an academic journal.

It is understood that Rusi Taleyarkhan from Oak Ridge, Fred Becchetti from the University of Michigan and their collaborator, Robert Nigmatulin, of the Russian Academy of Sciences, have repeated their work and subjected it to extensive peer review.

If confirmed, the discovery could rank among the most important since the dawn of the nuclear age. The scientists are, however, extremely cautious at this stage, saying only that they have detected all the signs of fusion rather than categorically confirming it.

Their technique uses pressure waves to generate tiny bubbles in a solution of acetone that has been infused with deuterium, a “heavy” form of hydrogen extracted from sea water.

At the heart of most hydrogen atoms is a nucleus comprising a single proton. Deuterium atoms, however, have an additional particle, a neutron. This makes them roughly twice as heavy and slightly unstable.

Physicists have long known that smashing two deuterium atoms together can fuse them into tritium, a third form of hydrogen with a proton and two neutrons. This fusion releases vast amounts of energy. This was the principle used to create the hydrogen bomb in 1945, but ever since then scientists have been struggling to find a way to control the process.

In the latest technique, the sound waves create bubbles that expand with explosive force. As the wave passes, the bubbles implode, generating extremely high temperatures. This process is known as sono-luminescence after the flashes of light emitted.

Until recently scientists could generate only temperatures of tens of thousands of degrees, far short of the sun’s 10m Celsius. This appears to have been solved by “hitting” the bubbles with another sound wave that compresses them so rapidly that temperatures soar and the deuterium fuses.

An insider said the researchers had detected “promising signs of fusion” including the creation of tritium and, crucially, the emission of neutrons. The researchers believe the neutrons have energy levels consistent with those that would be emitted by deuterium fusion.

This would enable them to escape the fate of Fleischmann and Pons, whose readings of neutrons enabled them to claim they had achieved fusion. It later emerged that these neutrons could have been the results of contamination.

Neil Turok, professor of theoretical physics at Cambridge University, said the results, if confirmed, were extremely exciting: “Cold fusion has a bad history but these laboratories are among the best in the world and they will have taken every precaution to get it right.”

The research has major implications for other fusion projects. Britain already hosts the Jet project at Culham in Oxford, where a machine has been built to research sustainable nuclear fusion reactions.

This weekend it emerged that Culham had scrapped its own research into sono-luminescence and other low-tech forms of fusion after a report from Thornton Greenland, a former senior scientist, suggesting it was unlikely ever to work.

Greenland said: “I thought there was too little evidence to show it would work, but this suggests I was wrong.”

Recently, Lord Sainsbury, the science minister, committed Britain to joining an international project to build a £2 billion fusion machine called Iter, Latin for “the Way”.

Even this, however, will be able to sustain fusion reactions for only 16 minutes. A proper fusion reactor capable of producing power is thought to be 30-50 years away.

Fleischmann, who now lives near Salisbury, still believes his results were correct although he regrets allowing colleagues to press him into publicising them before he was ready.

He said: “I hope they have achieved it. If they have, I hope people are ready for it this time.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energylist; sonoluminescence; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-251 next last
To: Willie Green
I may be wrong but I thought that conventional power generation relied on the expansion of high pressure steam through turbines. High temperatures are only the means for generating the high pressures required efficient power generation. Confusion of cause and effect in all walks of life hinders understanding and solutions of many, if not all, problems. I was personally involved in a situation where the long held belief that high temperatures were the causitive factor and not high pressures and I personally funded an experiment to prove that high pressures were the operative factor.
121 posted on 03/03/2002 3:49:06 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monocle
I may be wrong but I thought that conventional power generation relied on the expansion of high pressure steam through turbines. High temperatures are only the means for generating the high pressures required efficient power generation.

Yeah, but as at least a half-dozen people have pointed out to me, "cold" means anything less than the temperature of the sun.

That doesn't make me a believer in this cold fusion stuff. If the scientists want to continue to play around with their test tubes, that's fine with me. I have more interest in the nukes that can generate 1000 MW of electricity RIGHT NOW anyway.

122 posted on 03/03/2002 4:23:59 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I say, superb reporting Watson. This would be the best thing that ever happened to the OPEC cartel. Bravo
123 posted on 03/03/2002 4:32:08 AM PST by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Edward Teller's baby.

Although Teller was the man behind the US effort to build the "superbomb" (as he called it) and was responsible for the first US thermonucelar detonation (the Mike event), Mike was not a deliverable bomb -- it needed tons of refrigeration equipment to make the cryogenic deuterium used in the fusion process.

The Soviets actually produced a deliverable, hybrid fission-fusion bomb first, using lithium deuteride, a room temperature solid. The guy behind that design was Andrei Sakharov.

124 posted on 03/03/2002 4:39:09 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Don't tell the anti-nuclear crowd.

I think you're on to something. Most of the objections to nuclear power are spurious. The anti-nuke crowd are overprivileged luddites who don't want their advantaged positions threatened. The last thing they want is cheap, clean, abundant energy.

125 posted on 03/03/2002 4:41:24 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Yeah, but 1000 degree Celsius steam at atmospheric pressure would not be efficient in generating power from turbines. On the other hand, 110 degree Celsius at 1000 psig would highly efficient.
126 posted on 03/03/2002 4:46:47 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
It happens that the "father" of the Z Machine and I went to the same college (Caltech), and once upon a time used to work within a few miles of each other, so I emailed him for an update and any general comments he wants to share about fusion research. If he replies, I'll ping everybody who seems interested.
127 posted on 03/03/2002 5:00:55 AM PST by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
>>...that's why space-bound satellites look for the distinctive "double-flash" of modern weapons ...<<

Thats pretty interesting. I didn't know that. Thanks.

128 posted on 03/03/2002 5:13:49 AM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: monocle
With any machine that converts heat to mechanical energy, there is a thermodynamic limit to efficiency that improves the greater the difference between the input and output temperature. The efficiency is the ratio of the mechanical power you get out of the machine to the power needed to heat the stream or other fluid. So 110 C going down to, say, 25 C at the outlet (or even 0 C) will have an inherent thermodynamic efficiency limit much lower than going from 1000 C down to 25C. But you're right that a turbine also needs high pressure, this is for aerodynamic efficiency. Modern turbines combining both high temperature and high pressure get very close to the theoretical thermodynamic limit, within a few percent.
129 posted on 03/03/2002 5:15:33 AM PST by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Is there an US confirmation? I live near Oak Ridge....and nothing here.
130 posted on 03/03/2002 5:17:00 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogie
Yes--at least in '92

>>The Japanese goverment announced in 1992 that Fleischmann and Pons are senior scientific advisors for the five-year, multi-million dollar MITI cold fusion research program. They continue their work ast the Japanese facility, IMRA, near NICE.

131 posted on 03/03/2002 5:24:32 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Gordian Blade
If he replies, I'll ping everybody who seems interested.

Be sure to ping me; I need my marching orders from the Worldwide Nuclear Physics Conspiracy to find out how we're going to cover up this latest indiscretion. ;-)

132 posted on 03/03/2002 5:44:31 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

Comment #133 Removed by Moderator

To: Gordian Blade
The Carnot thermal efficiency, which is expressed in terms of the absolute temperature, could also be expressed in terms of pressure and volume given that PV = nRT.
134 posted on 03/03/2002 5:52:17 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
BINGO! Great minds think alike.

So it is the answer to Japan's biggest problem, the importation of energy. Freedom from the Mideast, and, since WW2, freedom from the fear of atomic waste and its health consequences.

135 posted on 03/03/2002 5:55:45 AM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

To: aculeus
If it is "Cold Fusion" they are after, why are they trying to achieve temperatures of 10m Celcius?
137 posted on 03/03/2002 6:16:10 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #138 Removed by Moderator

To: Willie Green
"But quantum physics wasn't very applicable to my Industrial Engineering major,"

Harumph...IE major...figures...could have guessed...harumph!

139 posted on 03/03/2002 6:48:07 AM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Banger
You are not a scientist me thinks. Cold is good.

See reply #43.

I like my coffee HOT.

140 posted on 03/03/2002 6:48:17 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson