Then when questioned try to support those asinine statements by saying
the first WTC bombing in '93 was the result of an FBI sting gone bad. ... Through a "miscommunication" the FBI did not intercept the group in time and several lives were lost.
As if the FBI wanted the bombing to go ahead for some reason
Then you blame the U.S. for "creating binLaden to help fight the Russians" as if he and his millions would not exist if it weren't for the U.S.
Then you insinuate that the U.S. really isn't trying to find bin Laden and pals by saying It sure is strange how we have military satellites that can ID a dime on the ground but somehow can't help track the whereabouts Osama and his boys.
Then you start to completely lose it when you said FYI, 9/11 would not have happened if our intelligence agencies had heeded warnings from the Israeli Mossad and other foreign security groups.
Again as if the CIA was told where, when, and how, the attacks would go but then decided they wanted the attack to take place or didn't want to stop it, but you never say why ...
Then you fall off the little yellow bus and say, How could half the cab drivers in NYC know not to be in the vicinity of the WTC yet the FBI/CIA supposedly knew nothing, heck the knowledge of what was coming was so prevalent in the NY Arab community that some morons were even caught with video cameras in place to film the event. Don't tell me this was some event beyond our control.
Now our government not only HAD to know, but was in control of the attacks.
All that while stating if someone doesn't agree with you they are either ignorant or believe everything Dan, Ted or Peter tells them.
And NOW you say you're not alleging any conspiracy???? How is anyone supposed to take you seriously?