Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Patriotic Bostonian
An honest man? Other than minor differences in the tax rate Mitt was just like Ted and was only slightly less liberal than him. Wow- what a choice? I talked to conservatives in 96 when Mitt ran and they voted for Ted. Why vote for a Republican who agreed with everything Ted said on social issues to the letter and was a liberal himself? For God sakes Mitt said that he would make abortion more accessible if he were elected than Teddy! Mitt ran one of the worst campaigns I ever saw. We were supposed to vote for him? Why? So we could get a junior senator with no clout and could bring home no pork but yet who agreed with just about everything Teddy said? God- you must be young to actually have faith in anything our Mass GOP does or says. It is a fraud.
67 posted on 03/04/2002 6:37:22 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Burkeman1
NO Argument!

The ONLY difference between the "TWO" is that "Teddy" & his "Staff" are FIXED!!---While "Mitt" & "His Staff" have a potentially Volatile "situation!"

There is a SMALL CHANCE that "Mitt" MIGHT be able to allow US to enter the 21st Century, & take advantage of the advances our "Technical Advances" have created!

Doc

68 posted on 03/05/2002 6:32:25 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson