Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Mass. wants Mitt
Boston Herald ^ | 2-27-02 | David R. Guarino

Posted on 02/27/2002 12:09:16 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative

Poll: Mass. wants Mitt

HERALD POLL/by David R. Guarino
Tuesday, February 26, 2002

Republican Mitt Romney would steamroll into the governor's race a certified front-runner, far more popular than the wounded acting governor and besting every Democrat in the field, a new Herald poll shows.

In a staggering sign the GOP could abandon acting Gov. Jane M. Swift for Romney, 48 percent of Republicans surveyed now disapprove of the job Swift is doing as governor.

Meanwhile, 69 percent of Republican voters view Romney favorably while only 36 percent give Swift favorable marks.

And while Swift's plummeting fortune now has her losing to all but the weakest Democrats, the poll shows Romney - hailed as the savior of the scandal-ridden Salt Lake City Olympics - easily beating all five Democratic contenders, trouncing three of them by double-digit margins.

``Mitt Romney would be in an extraordinarily strong position to come into the state and trump Swift for the nomination of the Republican Party,'' said Herald pollster R. Kelly Myers. ``Jane Swift is now in a very vulnerable political position.''

The poll, of 406 registered Massachusetts voters, was taken Saturday through yesterday. It has a 4.9 percent margin of error.

For Romney, now strongly considering a run against Swift as he mops up after the Utah games, the poll shows a clear path to victory that his advisers have said could push him into the race. Already some key Republicans are defecting from Swift as they try to woo Romney.

Among all voters, an enviable 57 percent favorable rating for Romney towers over Swift's meager 27 percent, the poll shows.

Just 8 percent of voters view Romney unfavorably, while Swift's negative rating soared to 53 percent in the latest poll - the highest since the scandals that plagued her early days as lieutenant governor.

His strong favorable ratings show voters still like the affable Belmont millionaire who lost to U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy in 1994, and prefer him to even popular Democrats like former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, state Treasurer Shannon P. O'Brien and Senate President Thomas F. Birmingham.

``He is getting just a huge boost coming out of Salt Lake that he could translate into a fairly strong position if he wanted to enter the race for governor of Massachusetts,'' Myers said.

White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card also bested Swift, earning 34 percent favorable ratings in the poll and beating three of the five Democrats in the race.

In matchups against Democrats, Republicans now appear poised to either win with Romney or lose with Swift.

O'Brien and Reich lead the pack, clearly leaving Birmingham behind when matched against either Republican.

The state treasurer beats Swift by 19 points, 49 percent to 30 percent, while Reich falls slightly behind at 48 percent to 30 percent. Birmingham has fallen into his own second tier among the Democrats, beating Swift by only 9 points even after a flood of costly television ads in recent weeks.

Former Democratic National Committee chairman Steve Grossman, who also pumped thousands into television ads, dropped into a statistical dead heat with Swift alongside former state Sen. Warren E. Tolman.

But the Democrats' hope of reclaiming the Corner Office reverses against Romney, the poll shows.

Romney beats O'Brien by 6 points, 38 percent to 32 percent and Reich by 9 points, 40 percent to 31 percent. Romney trounces the rest of the Democrats - Birmingham by 18 points, Grossman and Tolman by 25 points.

The numbers show Card, the Holbrook native, made the right decision to so far bow out of the race for governor, Myers said.

``He is somewhat more popular (than Swift) but he loses to Reich, loses to O'Brien and ties with Birmingham,'' Myers said. ``A Republican strategist looking at these numbers would not recommend bringing Andy Card to replace Swift on the ticket.''

Still, the polling data show Romney's popularity might be fleeting. The popularity drawn by commanding the closely watched Olympics, where he strolled with President Bush through the opening ceremonies, won't last, Myers said.

``If he did want to get into the race, he'd be better off doing it sooner than later to capitalize on these numbers while people are still thinking about the Olympics,'' Myers said. ``I don't know how quickly his favorable numbers will decline over time, but certainly they won't get any higher than today if he doesn't do something.''

For Swift, the latest poll shows she's hurting badly even with Romney out of the race.

Swift's popularity and job approval ratings, which soared after Sept. 11, have now steadily dropped to just above her December 2000 political lowpoint.

``She is only slightly better than she was at her worst, following the scandals that date back two years ago,'' Myers said. ``The continued downturn of the economy and the difficulties getting a budget passed have created some continued political problems for her.''



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: masslist; olympicslist; publicopinionlist; reichwatch; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: ninonitti
HAR!!

LOL!

She's about as "politically attractive" as O'Donnell, also!

She'd make a good caricature of a "Girl's School Matron!"

Doc

61 posted on 03/01/2002 6:40:05 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
The problem that we have is the hurding cats thing that you warned me about a long time ago. Mitt coulds win , all of the other posibilities are frightining.

BUT, another thing that we discussed, the Libertines are drawing the conservitive right away from Our Party. There is a split coming, I feel, and if the republians do not move to the right, they will lose the base. here has to be a Clear statement of principles and it ain't coming.

62 posted on 03/01/2002 7:32:47 PM PST by Little Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
Yeah sure. There is precious little we can do but talk among ourselves. The Globe several weeks ago in the Sunday Focus section did a story on the "real power" in our state and it ain't anywhere near the governer's office or really even elected pols. Massachusetts is run by an oligarchic machine- nameless and faceless. We have a veneer of "politics" that puts people to sleep. Every real decision in this state is made out of sight and by people no one elected.
63 posted on 03/02/2002 6:01:36 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cactmh
No, you are the one who doesn't get it...we'll have to agree to disagree.

Burkeman1 is right. Massachusetts politics is strange, confusing and hypocritical.

64 posted on 03/02/2002 6:12:03 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
"......by People no one elected..."

Probably true, but we need to Fight "the system!" The Governor HAS a little power--Short of "Armed Revolution," we NEED to "TRY" to influence "The System!"

Doc

65 posted on 03/04/2002 6:08:56 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
I think that the future of Conservatism in New England is actually with the Democratic Party.

You are so right! I know a lot of old-time Roosevelt democrats who treat their politics like they do religion. You can be to the extreme left or the extreme right. To them there is no difference. You must vote democrat. that's the way it is in Massachusetts. So our best chance to win in that state is to put up conservative democrats. Oh, and don't forget July 18 is Mary Jo Kopechne Day. All you Taxachusetts should meet at the bridge.

66 posted on 03/04/2002 6:36:59 PM PST by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Patriotic Bostonian
An honest man? Other than minor differences in the tax rate Mitt was just like Ted and was only slightly less liberal than him. Wow- what a choice? I talked to conservatives in 96 when Mitt ran and they voted for Ted. Why vote for a Republican who agreed with everything Ted said on social issues to the letter and was a liberal himself? For God sakes Mitt said that he would make abortion more accessible if he were elected than Teddy! Mitt ran one of the worst campaigns I ever saw. We were supposed to vote for him? Why? So we could get a junior senator with no clout and could bring home no pork but yet who agreed with just about everything Teddy said? God- you must be young to actually have faith in anything our Mass GOP does or says. It is a fraud.
67 posted on 03/04/2002 6:37:22 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
NO Argument!

The ONLY difference between the "TWO" is that "Teddy" & his "Staff" are FIXED!!---While "Mitt" & "His Staff" have a potentially Volatile "situation!"

There is a SMALL CHANCE that "Mitt" MIGHT be able to allow US to enter the 21st Century, & take advantage of the advances our "Technical Advances" have created!

Doc

68 posted on 03/05/2002 6:32:25 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SP67
Sounds like a good plan to me!
69 posted on 03/05/2002 10:25:19 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson