[Tacis]

Disagree. Bush was still wet behind the ears and would never have been able to overcome Clinton's ability to control the media, all Willie's Chinese money and, the voter fraud in the democrap cities.

Besides, if Willie had not won, he would still have been as sleazy, crooked, and mendacious, but all the world might not have known about it. The shame and disgrace that Willie and his legacy so richly deserve came in his second term.

I've said it before but proof of Bush's capability came during his second term as Governor of Texas. The proof, in pre-9/11 days, revoluted most liberals and even talking about it outrages the lefties. Bush, in his second term, signed almost 100 death warrants, proving that he could make the hard decisions that Willie and his sewer dwellers would only blather about 'til they found the alternative that put the most cash in their own pockets.

[TomGuy]

hahaha..true...and another point:

Had Clinton lost in 1996, he'd have run again in 2000...and (if not re-elected) every election thereafter. It's hard enough to get him off the stage and out of the media spotlight as it is. In a way, we can be thankful he was re-elected and is prohibited from running again.