Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zoyd
If the Boy Scouts owned an apartment building and rented out units to the general public, they would be required to make the apartments available to applicants without regard to their races.
242 posted on 02/19/2002 1:09:58 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
I'm not talking about Boy Scouts owning apartments. I'm talking about Boy Scouts not allowing gay men to be Scoutmasters.

Whose rights are trumped? Daddy Gov ('our society) or the Boy Scouts?

244 posted on 02/19/2002 1:14:38 PM PST by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe

If the Boy Scouts owned an apartment building and rented out units to the general public, they would be required to make the apartments available to applicants without regard to their races.

The fourth amendment refuses government access to a person's home, property or business without a properly signed warrant. Yet the government forces business owners to give access to total strangers via discrimination laws. In effect the government, taxpayers' employees, can't be trusted, yet the same government that can't be trusted proclaims that business owner must trust total strangers.

272 posted on 02/19/2002 2:49:09 PM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson