Posted on 02/11/2002 9:02:30 PM PST by JohnHuang2
February 12, 2002
Trumped-Up Eco-Terrorism: An Arsonist's Tale
By JAMES HIBBERD
HOENIX, Feb. 11 At first, Mark Warren Sands says, it was a matter of pique. Someone was building a house in his upscale Phoenix suburb where Mr. Sands did not want it. So, he says, he burned it down.
But as one arson grew to eight, and as fear spread that Phoenix was under attack by eco-terrorists fighting residential sprawl, Mr. Sands, a laid- off public relations and marketing executive, began lighting fires seemingly to prove something to himself: that he still knew how to run a campaign.
"I knew what a good news story was; I knew how to sell it," he said in a recent prison interview as his sentencing approached. "My drug was the news media coverage. There was the excitement of waiting for the media coverage to come out. There was a sense of power."
Mr. Sands gained national attention by setting fires at construction sites adjoining two mountain preserves here from April 2000 to January 2001 and claiming, in notes at the crime scenes and in taunting letters to the press, that they were the work of a group he called the Coalition to Save the Preserves.
But one night last April he was arrested after defacing a sign at a construction site under surveillance. The police found saliva DNA linking him to letters sent to news organizations, and he confessed the arson to a friend who had been wired by investigators. In a plea agreement that called for a recommended prison term of 15 to 20 years, he admitted eight counts of extortion affecting interstate commerce and one count of use of fire to commit a felony.
Today the 50-year-old Mr. Sands, who is married and the father of two grown sons and a teenage daughter, was sentenced here to 18 years in prison by a federal district judge, Susan R. Bolton, who also ordered him to pay $2.8 million in restitution. Relatives and friends at the hearing read statements citing his history of community service, while victims articulated their loss and fear. Joseph C. Welty, a prosecutor in the case, said Mr. Sands's victims numbered many more than those who lost their houses.
"What he did was target a community at large," Mr. Welty said. "And what did he get out of it? Ego gratification. The ability to manipulate what would be on the news. The ability to play cat and mouse with law enforcement."
Mr. Sands had agreed to the prison interview on the condition that nothing he said be published until after his sentencing. He said he did not want to risk making any remark that might adversely affect his standing with the judge.
Sitting behind a glass partition at the Central Arizona Detention Center in nearby Florence, he recalled, "At first, it was a small, personal, limited-to-the-neighborhood environmental protest." He set that first fire on April 9, 2000, at a large home under construction near the Phoenix Mountain Preserve, because, he said, the house was spoiling his favorite jogging trail. As he saw it, "that was my land that was my entrance to the preserve."
"The house was a direct affront to me personally," said Mr. Sands, himself the owner of a modest house bordering the preserve.
When the owner of the destroyed home announced that he would rebuild, Mr. Sands scrawled a message on a construction sign at the site. "U Build We Burn Agin," he wrote, using the "we" and a misspelling in hopes the police would believe that the fire had been set by a youthful environmental group. On Oct. 1, 2000, he found the site unguarded and again set the home ablaze.
The local press pounced on the story of a mysterious arsonist with an anti-development agenda. The attention, Mr. Sands said, thrilled and inspired him.
"A light went on: `I've got a campaign,' " he said. "I thought I could say something about the uncontrolled development. I didn't think that this was private land and I was being a hypocrite."
Local investigators brought in the Federal Bureau of Investigation for assistance and placed the Phoenix Mountain Preserve, a 26,000-acre recreation park, under surveillance. Homeowners and developers raised a $76,200 reward and encircled their properties adjacent to the preserve with barbed wire and floodlights.
Mr. Sands came to view his arson as a risky, criminal substitute for his derailed marketing career. (He had lost his job as director of marketing for a Phoenix health care organization in June 2000.) In messages to the news media, he identified the Coalition to Save the Preserves as an eclectic foursome of mountain bikers. The point of the deception, he said, was "to make it a bigger story, more exciting."
He became increasingly at ease with his crimes. Once, he said, he set a fire after refereeing a high school soccer match. Another time, he went to a holiday party, set a fire, then did some Christmas shopping at a mall.
But by early last year, the fires, which had initially attracted some sympathy from people who felt that too much development had infringed on Arizona's virgin desert, were drawing decidedly negative publicity. News accounts about his distraught victims, and the death of a Phoenix fireman in an unrelated blaze, persuaded him to end his campaign, Mr. Sands said.
Yet he could not resist leaving one last message. On April 20, three months after his last attack, he was arrested for writing on a property sign that pledged an environmentally sensitive residential development.
Press coverage has long since lost its appeal, particularly now that his family knows of his crimes.
"I feel for the fire victims," Mr. Sands said, "but the real victims are my wife, my daughter, my sons. The hell that I've created for people who care about me is almost unimaginable."
As he saw it, "that was my land that was my entrance to the preserve."
That's how "environmentalists" view "the wilderness"... as their personal land.
Like ELF, he is a threat to even people with sincere concern for the environment. I hope they throw away the key to this guy's cell.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
He set that first fire on April 9, 2000, at a large home under construction near the Phoenix Mountain Preserve, because, he said, the house was spoiling his favorite jogging trail. As he saw it, "that was my land that was my entrance to the preserve."
"The house was a direct affront to me personally," said Mr. Sands, himself the owner of a modest house bordering the preserve.
In my area some of the most hostile enviral anti human Nazis are recent people in the valley. They own large homes with good views. Their homes are made of sacred wood. Within weeks of moving in the enviral anti other human virus strikes and the newcomers join the no new homes Nazis with money, time and a venegance! Of course that drives the value of their homes right up when no new homes are allowed.
But as one arson grew to eight...
Sounds more like a serious nut, not even an activist.
Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!
The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed !!
An Armed Citizen, Is A Safe Citizen !!
No Guns, No Rights !!
Molon Labe !!
Timber and oil are other resources that are getting increasingly in short supply and we have wealthy private corporations and individuals who take much more than they give.
To make a case for conservation: Creating land that has time to return to early prarie conditions where erosion and native fauna and wildlife abound is a good thing. Allowing cattle and sheep to graze the land should come at a fair price. It is public land that these people exploit. If it were private land you can bet they would pay a fair price.
Not every piece of gold or every gallon of oil needs to be extracted and put into a barrel to have worth. Leaving a small reserve of "all" our natural resources is sound plannig for the long term security of our country. No crise exits that threatens our way of life so much that we can't save 2 or 3% of our resources in their natural state.
Our state governments and the federal government should collect a real fee from logging companies and others who exploit the public lands and not have oversight of various industries by former ceos and board members.
L
Geez, I just did a quick review of the Constitution, Article 1, Section 8 which lays out what the goobermint can and can't do and nowhere in that do I find any authorization from "we the people" for the Federals to own one square foot of "National Forest", "National Park" or any other such.
All that land should be thrown open. Get the goobermint out of the land-owning business.
Public land, my patootie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.