Lack of denial is hardly proof of guilt, Clinton denied having anything to do with Lewinsky. They may be swingers they may not.. either way, I am not going to condemn them as bad parents even if they were. If they did something to put their children at risk, related to being swingers or not, then I will judge those acts as to whether or not they were.
Time will tell with this case, and I pray that this child and all missing children are found safe.
Did you not jump to conclusions when passing judgement on the young woman whose baby was stolen from the bus station on Christmas eve? Why are you reserving judgement on these parents when you have no trouble deeming the other one irresponsible.
Did being swingers make them "bad parents"? Who knows? On the surface, they were irresponsible. They were certainly irresponsible on that night. You can call failure to check your kids for 12 hours straight strange, but I call it irresponsible. If they had a good reason for not checking the kids, any reasonable person would have given one, don't you think? And since we're not a judge and jury and they're not on trial for being swingers, I'm not going to apply courtroom levels of evidence to my speculation. Since I'm not a juror and they're not on trial, I'm free to construe their lack of denial of their lifestyle as a confirmation. Any reasonable person would deny it if it weren't true.
As to whether their lifestyle led to their failure to check on their children, that's a different story....
But I want to make it clear that I in no way believe that this whole thing is some sort of divine punishment for their lifestyle, or for being "bad parents". We only know that on that particular night they behaved irresponsibly. I have no idea how they treated their kids every other night.