Posted on 02/11/2002 4:30:25 AM PST by IM2Phat4U
The left has launched an all out attack on President Bushs Judicial Nominee, Judge Charles Pickering, and it is time to fight back.
If the liberals can successfully bork Judge Pickering, they will be emboldened and begin targeting other Bush nominees for destruction.
Of course, this is also a warm up for the big one - - Bushs nominee to the Supreme Court. If we start losing battles to the lefts borking-machine, Bush may feel the need to compromise at the Supreme Court level.
It is time for FRs Bush critics and Bush fans to join together and fight for Judge Pickering. If you are not willing to fight for Judge Pickering today, you waive your right to complain in the future if Souter II is nominated to the Supreme Court.
Here is the best FR article to date on the Pickering nomination:
Judicial Vacancy Crisis Worsens: Thomas Jipping denounces Democrat Assault on Charles PickeringJudicial Vacancy Crisis Worsens: Thomas Jipping denounces Democrat Assault on Charles PickeringHere's a story from the judicial confirmation archives.
Interest groups are opposing a judicial nominee down in Mississippi. In 1967, he had testified against the Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan for fire-bombing a civil rights activist and worked with the FBI to investigate and prosecute other KKK members. In 1981, he represented a black man falsely accused of robbing a white teenage girl.
Since then, he initiated and coordinated a bipartisan, multi-racial group to foster race relations in his home county, chaired the county heart fund and Red Cross and March of Dimes chapters, and headed the county drug education council. He currently sits on the board of directors of the Institute for Racial Reconciliation at the University of Mississippi and is helping develop a local program to help at-risk black youth.
This is the kind of background that should make lefties positively tingle. Prominent black leaders including a liberal Carter-appointed judge and former NAACP chapter president support the nomination. So do a former Democratic Mississippi governor and Mississippi Democratic Party chairman.
No, he's not some warm-fuzzy liberal Clinton nominee. Nor is the opposition led by David Duke. Charles Pickering, Sr., was nominated by President George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and he's opposed by People for the American Way, the Alliance for Justice, and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights who say he would "turn the clock back" on civil rights. Pretty weird, huh?
This attack signals that Senate Democrats' guerilla war against President Bush's judicial appointments has moved into Phase Three.
In Phase One, the national campaign, Senate Democrats keep overall confirmations as low as possible. No matter how high judicial vacancies climb, or how many nominees President Bush sends to fill them, the confirmation train will never more than crawl along.
In Phase Two, the regional campaign, Senate Democrats pick fights that stall confirmations to particular judicial circuits. In the Midwest, for example, Michigan Democrats Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow are blocking all seven of President Bush's appeals court nominees to vacancies in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee. They say it's over the way Clinton nominees were treated a few years ago. You'd think they would find an excuse that did not sound like second-graders in a spat about kooties, but the stated reason doesn't much matter. It's the stall that counts.
And now it's Phase Three, surgical strikes against individual nominees. These leftist groups think the judiciary is like a political cafeteria and they want the menu to include more of their favorite foods. That a judge might simply follow the law and leave the politics, liberal or conservative, to the people just doesn't compute. So they attack nominees like Judge Pickering based on their politics.
The correct way to look at judges, however, is whether they follow the law, no matter what their politics. A judge would be just as wrong to ignore the law and impose a conservative agenda as a liberal one. Judge Pickering knows the difference between politics and law, between the state senator he used to be and the federal judge he is today. That's why President Bush wants to elevate him to the appeals court and why he should be confirmed.
Unfortunately, President Bush missed a golden opportunity to bring this to the American people. In his State of the Union Address Tuesday night, he never mentioned a word about the triple-digit judicial vacancy crisis, not a word about his dozens of nominees languishing in the Senate, not a word about the vicious, misleading attacks on men like Judge Pickering.
The attack on Judge Pickering is just a signal of more to come. The far-left seeks a judiciary they can count on to deliver the political goods no matter what the people want. They are just getting their feet wet, sharpening their teeth for bigger battles to come. Three phases are just the beginning.
Without sustained public presidential leadership, they will be tough to stop and a judiciary truly independent from politics, that follows the law rather than the headlines, will be tough to achieve.
An example of what the left has been up to based on FR posts:
Pickering Foes mount Late Push
Civil Rights Organizations Come together to Oppose Pickering
Senate Urged to Oppose Pickering
Judicial Confirmation Hearing Evokes Civil Rights Struggle [NYTs Smear]
Federally Funded Planned Parenthood Launches All Out Attack Against Bush Judicial Nominee
Appeals Court Nominee Faces Trouble Over Cross-Burning Case
Here is a link to use when lobbying:
Communicate! Let the Sons of... [FR Effective Lobbying Links]
Here is a link to the Senate Judiciary Committee:
* Call Your Two Senators today.
* If your Senator sits on the judiciary committee, you need to make sure every conservative organization in your state is activated and fighting for this nomination.
* If your Senator is on the Judiciary Committee, post a link to this on your FR State board and make sure those folks are activated.
* Contact pro-life organizations, 2nd Amendment Groups, and Homeschooling groups, and ask them to notify their members and take action.
* The left will become more bold if we simply roll over on this nomination. Also, Bush will be less inclined to nominate conservative judges if the Left is able to bork them with ease.
Senator Mike DeWine contact info:
140 Russell Senate Building, Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-2315
Fax: (202) 224-6519
TDD: (202) 224-9921
Casework Hotline (please, Ohio citizens only): 1-800-205-OHIO
Fax: (202) 224-6519
TDD: (202) 224-9921
Casework Hotline (please, Ohio citizens only): 1-800-205-OHIO
|
Maria Cantwell, Washington |
Mitch McConnell, Kentucky |
||
North Carolina |
|||
|
Ok North Carolina.....Sen. John Edwards can be reached at the following:
email address: http://edwards.senate.gov/mailform.html
Senator John Edwards
United States Senate
225 Dirksen Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-3154
fax (202) 228-1374
301 Century Post Office
300 Fayetteville St. Mall
Raleigh, NC 27601
(919) 856-4245
Federal Courthouse
Suite 219
401 W. Trade Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
(704) 344-6154
Suite 401
125 South Elm Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 333-5311
Federal Office Building
Suite 200
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
(828) 285-0760
Suite 1-C
401 West First Street
Greenville, NC 27834
(252) 931-1111
Nevertheless, he needs to feel some heat.
He may start moving back to the right now since he and Jim Petro both want to be Governor and the conservative wins in Ohio GOP primaries.
Excerpt:
The left has launched an all out attack on President Bushs Judicial Nominee, Judge Charles Pickering, and it is time to fight back.
If the liberals can successfully bork Judge Pickering, they will be emboldened and begin targeting other Bush nominees for destruction.
Of course, this is also a warm up for the big one - - Bushs nominee to the Supreme Court. If we start losing battles to the lefts borking-machine, Bush may feel the need to compromise at the Supreme Court level.
It is time for FRs Bush critics and Bush fans to join together and fight for Judge Pickering. If you are not willing to fight for Judge Pickering today, you waive your right to complain in the future if Souter II is nominated to the Supreme Court.
(((PING))))))
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my ping list!. . .don't be shy.
Exactly. The Conservatives response to EMILY's List.
This strategy yields these results:
1. It immediately fills the void with justices whose rulings are just as legal as if they'd been confirmed by the Senate.
2. It puts the Senate on notice that they are forfeiting their right to have a say. A reasonable climate of discussion would allow the President to send moderate conservatives instead of hardline conservatives. It would allow the Senate opportunity to influence. This current unreasonable climate and a worsening shortage mean that President Bush will be forced BY NECESSITY to use recess appointments. That NECESSITY will sell from the bully pulpit.
3. It enables the Republicans to await the next Senatorial (2002) campaign to see if they regain a majority in the Senate. If so, then all the recess appointments can be made final.
4. It even enables the Republicans to strike once again in the 2004 campaign. One thing the Florida recount fiasco taught us was that the Senate is seated PRIOR to the new president assuming office. So EVEN IF GW Bush is defeated, but the Republicans win the Senate in that year, then the judicial committee, chaired by Republicans, can do a mass acceptance of all prior recess appointments.
5. If GW Bush gains a second term, and he doesn't gain a Republican Senate, he can continue playing the recess appointment game. We could have conservatives on the court for up to seven years....to include the Supreme Court. And he would have two more opportunities to regain the Senate and make them permanent.
6. If he never gains Senate consent and steps down from being president after a period of conservative judicial decision-making, then those decisions will have taken hold in the nation and their reversal would then take a new democratic president time to reverse. There would be a great store of appointments that could then be made by a democratic president, but who would ever be able to predict when the Senate would be reversed to the Republicans and this who thing could start over again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.