Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critic-at-Arms: ENFORCED BY RADAR
Sierra Times ^ | Keith R. Wood

Posted on 02/08/2002 7:28:59 AM PST by Sir Gawain

Critic-at-Arms: ENFORCED BY RADAR
by Keith R. Wood
02.06.02 © 2002, all rights reserved


A few years ago, "Speed Enforced By Radar" signs invoked the image of Gary Burghoff standing at the roadside, clipboard in hand. Today, however, Robo-Cop is with us. It arrived several years ago, in the form of "Photo Radar," and in those automatic
cameras which snap images of people who run red lights at intersections.

On the face of it, there should be no problem -- the honest man will say that anyone who isn't speeding or blasting through red lights has nothing to fear, and the others shouldn't be doing that anyway.

The problem is that the implementation of technology is always subject to the whim of politicians, who see these things as the key to the "click and convict" cash register.

Thus, we have heard of traffic engineers being told to cut yellow-light times to as little as three seconds on busy streets, actually reducing highway safety!

There you are, be-bopping down Main, right at the speed limit, when you see the light change to yellow. You, the experienced driver, then use your judgment and decide that you can't safely stop before you get to the intersection, so you keep going -- SURPRISE! The light went red before you got to the line! If that weren't enough, you see the flash of the traffic camera, and your attention is drawn to the big sign proclaiming that fines are $271 . . .WATCH OUT! You almost didn't see that kid pull out of the gas station right in front of you. Whew!

Now, a block further along, you see the light change, and manage to stop . . .but your car is a couple of feet past the limit line, and the flash tells you that you've rung the cash register again. By this time, you are getting pretty worried and a bit hot under the collar, and a couple of blocks along, you see the light change and you aren't going to get got again, so you slam on the brakes . . .and end up in the
intersection anyway, after the guy behind you slams into your car.

Gee, isn't this great?

Photo radar has brought its own hazards, as drivers on busy streets are distracted by the radarmobiles parked in unexpected places, often partway into traffic lanes (the better to shoot you, my dear). When the word got around that the citations are only valid if there is a clear shot of the driver, people started doing various things to reduce their risk of being identified. Rumor has it that the first picture shot by one Arizona city's radarmobile featured a driver wearing a gorilla mask, but most attempts to hide are not so innocuous, as people frantically put their hands or even briefcases in front of their faces, or duck their heads out of sight of the camera . . .and the road.

. . .and they claim that photo-radar "improves traffic safety." Yeah,
right . . .

One unexpected source of complaints about photo radar has been the law enforcement community itself. It's no secret that cops generally ignore the traffic laws that they enforce (much of the time with valid reason), and there are countless photos of police cars
rushing past
photomobiles on urgent runs. Each of these citations must be answered, just as the cite that you or I might get, because there is no exemption under law for emergency vehicles except under emergency conditions, with lights and siren going.

As you might expect, this is an extreme annoyance to the cops, especially that minority who think of themselves as a special class of royalty. Flipping open the badge case only works within the fraternity, not against the impartial glass eye.

Of course, the solution to this problem eludes our Elect Officials, as does any understanding of the Constitution of the United States of America. That solution is to remove Robo-Cop from our streets . . .or to remove from office those who feel that we should all be subject to "click and convict."


Keith R. Wood holds to his own convictions (none of which happen to be of the Robo-Cop variety), and is on the loose in America. He appreciates comments from his readers, sent to the Mailbag.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: photoradar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Please pardon the slight. But what makes you think destruction of these devices would not garner public support?
21 posted on 02/08/2002 10:53:57 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Plastic coke bottle. One shot silencer.
22 posted on 02/08/2002 10:57:04 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
"But what makes you think destruction of these devices would not garner public support?"

Because vandalism, destruction of public property, and violent lawlessness are generally not well-tolerated in this country.

P.J. O'Rourke had a brilliant line in one of his essays on Somalia- it went something like "In Mogadishu, everything that can be accomplished with guns had pretty much already been done". He was referring to the utter destruction of the city and the society.

We are not Somalis, and we don't settle civil problems by pulling a gun out of the trunk and blasting away. And, having served in countries where they DID "settle" problems that way, I am glad that we don't.

23 posted on 02/08/2002 11:26:08 AM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I would argue that destruction of these devices would raise the ire of only the police and the politicians and those who stand to actually gain from the system.

For example, there weren't many tears shed over Romania's last dictator when he was publically executed.

I challenge you to come up with 10 people who have been trapped by these bloddy devices who think that they are a really good idea and theat we should install more of them.

The general population may not actively support a person who destroys them, but they probably won't go out of their way to help apprehend them either.

24 posted on 02/08/2002 11:41:09 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Plastic coke bottle. One shot silencer.

Yeh, but the soda makes the gun real gummy!

25 posted on 02/08/2002 11:44:26 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Thanks for the ping.

I'm considering a BIGGER FReep of the camera next month sometime. And maybe passing along info to motorists about how to defeat the cameras

;-)

26 posted on 02/08/2002 12:41:37 PM PST by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
What happened in your case?
27 posted on 02/08/2002 1:00:18 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Haven't heard a peep from 'em since last week. Maybe they gave up.
28 posted on 02/08/2002 1:16:34 PM PST by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson