Skip to comments.
Convicted murderer who attacked attorney sentenced to 10 years
The Sacramento Bee ^
| January 31, 2002
| Staff
Posted on 02/02/2002 9:57:40 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:32:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
An alleged gang member who slashed his defense attorney's face in front of stunned jurors during his trial was sentenced Thursday to more than 10 years in prison for an earlier assault.
Daniel Verduzco, 21, received his sentence of 10 years and 4 months in prison over a loudspeaker in a holding cell. He was barred from the courtroom because he was considered a security risk, court clerk Anthony Klune said.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
This useless piece of sh!t helps illustrate why there must be a death penalty.
If the worst thing that can happen to this guy no matter what he does is being sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole and he has already been given that sentence, how much would they have to pay you to guard him?
To: Bubba_Leroy
Also illustrates just why certain prisoners - any kind of prisoners, just cannot be treated according to the usually prescribed rules. A bit of a wordy comment, but it strikes a bell here- re those ******** in Camp X-ray. Safety and security first.
To: Bubba_Leroy
Mad dog! Someone run get the shotgun.
3
posted on
02/02/2002 10:08:36 AM PST
by
lsee
To: Bubba_Leroy
The attack happened before the verdict. So why did he do it? He didn't like the lawyer's closing argument?
4
posted on
02/02/2002 10:22:00 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Bubba_Leroy
His behavior rather cast doubt upon his credibility that he was innocent in other areas, don't you think?
5
posted on
02/02/2002 10:45:47 AM PST
by
RLK
To: RLK
The thing is, why would he care? He has already been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. What difference does it make if they sentence him to a few more years or even several hundred years in prison?
The best thing that could happen would be for him to get shot trying to escape.
To: Bubba_Leroy
This useless piece of sh!t helps illustrate why there must be a death penalty. Yes, but if he needs a heart transplant, he will surely get one, at taxpayers expense.
7
posted on
02/03/2002 8:48:58 AM PST
by
Mark17
To: Bubba_Leroy
Cutting your attorney pretty much guarantees a not-real-effective appeal.parsy.
8
posted on
02/03/2002 8:52:29 AM PST
by
parsifal
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson