Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Exnihilo

No, no, no. I do not care to spend my time arguing with libertarians. Those people love the sound of the last word far too much for my tastes.

But if there were a couple of tangible problems with them, I'd place:

1. that they always want revolutionary change rather than baby steps (in an "all or nothing" game, they have too little power to get it all, and that leaves "nothing" everytime),
2. they consistently misinterpret the Constitution (e.g., they think that the phrase "general welfare" has ZERO meaning),
3. they constantly cry wolf about nebulous, unnamed freedoms that they think they've lost

at the top of my list of problems with them.

They are idealists. They argue for a perfect world, and I find that pursuit unrealistic.

11 posted on 02/01/2002 10:31:18 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Well said. They definitely are defensive and love to get the last word in. They seem to be out of touch with the reality of how to really make any changes. "Either remove the whole tax code or just forget it". I've also noticed an alarming number of them are mensas. This shows that they are extreme elitists and simply don't want to be involved in a normal party because they can't stand out in a crowd well enough that way.
33 posted on 02/01/2002 10:47:17 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
Libertarianism is anything but an argument for a perfect world. Libertarianism denies the folly of perfection imagined by those who would control others.
34 posted on 02/01/2002 10:47:58 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
1. that they always want revolutionary change rather than baby steps (in an "all or nothing" game, they have too little power to get it all, and that leaves "nothing" everytime)
There's something to be said for this argument, IMO it's the difference between LPers and what I call "small l libertarians", which are much more numerous.

I predict that within 20 years, "conservative" and "liberal" will be less meaningful than "libertarian" and communitarian.

-Eric

50 posted on 02/01/2002 10:53:21 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
2. they consistently misinterpret the Constitution (e.g., they think that the phrase "general welfare" has ZERO meaning)

So what meaning does it have?

261 posted on 02/01/2002 12:48:27 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: All

Please refer to Post #11 in its entirity, whenever possible, rather than pinging me as your first impulse for a reply on this thread.

Post #11 pretty well sums up my views on this subject.

409 posted on 02/03/2002 9:34:12 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson