Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PUERTO RICO: ACEVEDO: Panel head calls 956 'smart,' but makes no promises
The San Juan Star | Thursday, January 31, 2002 | By ROBERT FRIEDMAN: STAR Washington Bureau

Posted on 01/31/2002 1:30:51 PM PST by 4Freedom

WASHINGTON - While no promises were made, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., agreed that Puerto Rico made the right move by proposing the new section 956 plan to improve the island's economy, rather than attempting to "revisit" tax programs already killed in Congress, Resident Commissioner Anibal Acevedo Vila said Wednesday.

"He was aware of the [956] proposal and told us it was a smart thing to come up with a new proposal and not to revisit Section 936 and 30A," Acevedo Vila said, commenting on a meeting Tuesday between Gov. Calderon, Economic Development Secretary Ramon Cantero Frau, himself and the key lawmaker.

Thomas, who heads the tax-writing panel that must sign off on the Section 956 plan for it to be approved in Congress, "got the message" that Puerto Rico's economy has been hurt since the demise of 936, the resident commissioner said.

He was told the island has lost 27,000 jobs since 1996, when the Section 936 and 30A tax plans began phasing out, and that manufacturing jobs are at their lowest in 20 years, Acevedo Vila said.

"Since manufacturing makes up 42 percent or 43 percent of the island's GNP [gross national product], this has badly hurt the whole Puerto Rico economy," the resident commissioner said.

Thomas pointed out that the free trade agreement between the United States and Mexico was hurting Puerto Rico, Acevedo Vila said.

The California Republican also "agreed that every dollar invested in the Puerto Rican economy comes back in goods [some $19 billion annually] bought from the United States," Acevedo Villa said.

Still, the resident commissioner acknowledged that while the meeting was "very positive," Thomas did not commit to pushing for the island's new proposal.

The 956 plan would allow subsidiaries of U.S. companies in Puerto Rico that become Controlled Foreign Corporations to repatriate their profits 90 percent tax free.

Right now, firms are taxed the full 35 percent on income brought back to the states. This causes them to invest that income overseas for better tax advantages.

The island hopes its proposal, if approved, will attract high tech companies to set up operations in Puerto Rico and create more jobs at higher salaries for skilled workers, while affording the U.S. Treasury taxes it might not otherwise collect.

Acevedo Vila brought up Wednesday another possible legislative vehicle for the Puerto Rico tax program, other than the economic initiative now being debated in Congress.

He said Democrats could be pushing for a minimum wage hike this year and that tax benefits usually accompany such legislation.

The 956 proposal could be included in that type of package, he said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
The California Republican also "agreed that every dollar invested in the Puerto Rican economy comes back in goods [some $19 billion annually] bought from the United States," Acevedo Vila said.

Oh, that's just great. We give them billions of U.S. Taxpayer's hard earned dollars, every stink'n year, and they SHOP-TILL-THEY-DROP for American stuff with it.

Let's take that brilliant economic strategy and see if we can erase the trade deficit with it. Not.

I'm going to call GM and tell them that for every $30,000 they invest, in my household, I'll buy a $30,000 car from them.

I think I'll call Carnival Cruises, Resorts International and Disney and tell them that for every $5,000 they invest, in my household, that I'll take a $5,000 cruise or a vacation with them.

This could work, if their executives are all stupid, liberal Democrats.

A concept that our politicians think makes such great business sense for the U.S. Taxpayers ought to make the private sector ecstatic. No?

>sarcasm<

1 posted on 01/31/2002 1:30:52 PM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
The island hopes its proposal, if approved, will attract high tech companies to set up operations in Puerto Rico and create more jobs at higher salaries for skilled workers, while affording the U.S. Treasury taxes it might not otherwise collect.

They don't pay income tax?.

Vieques, no agreement no deal.

2 posted on 01/31/2002 2:01:22 PM PST by ijcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
The residents of Puerto Rico pay no federal income tax, they pay no sales tax and real estate tax is almost non-existant.

The former section 936 windfall profits tax scheme resulted in companies, like Pepsi and Coke, receiving about $350,000 in yearly federal tax savings for each job they created in Puerto Rico. The kicker is they would have created those jobs anyway. They wanted to sell in the Puerto Rican market.

This is just another big scam. The companies get rich. The politicians get rich. The average resident of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Taxpayer get screwed.

3 posted on 01/31/2002 2:14:54 PM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Major Malfunction
I thought you might find this latest tax windfall scheme, by the corrupt politicians in Puerto Rico, interesting.
4 posted on 02/01/2002 3:32:26 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; Weikel
If Puerto Rico scams section 956 out of the U.S. Taxpayers, I think some of us Freepers should form a Controlled Foreign Corporation.

Why should only corrupt politicians get to steal all the money?

5 posted on 02/03/2002 10:14:44 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Im not rich yet im still in college Im just a wannabe( who has done a lot more research and is much more serious than most wannabes but still don't consider me an expert). Still its a good idea to shelter assets I'd have to know the specifics of the tax laws. Right now I don't really own any taxable assets and I only work during summertime. Still I reccomend doing anything within the law to avoid the socialistic US income tax. One thing you can do with your house is form a "church" and sign your house over to the church which you of course own. That gets you outta paying property taxes on it.
6 posted on 02/03/2002 10:23:48 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
You may even be able to get a charitable contribution deduction on your income tax when you sign your house over to the "church" you own too( I would consult with a tax attorney on the details of this before you actually do anything but after that).
7 posted on 02/03/2002 10:27:32 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: weikel
'Church of the Hopeless Beach Bums'

'Church of the Heavenly Thong Bikinis'

'Church of the Reforming Tax Dodgers'

>sarcasm<

8 posted on 02/03/2002 10:56:18 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Ever heard of the universal life church you can become a reverend with your own chapter real quick online.
9 posted on 02/03/2002 11:00:04 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: weikel
No, I never heard of it. What's their website, www.taxfraud.com?

>sarcasm<

10 posted on 02/03/2002 11:37:52 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Universal Life Church. I'd check with a tax attorney but as far as I know its perfectly legal.
11 posted on 02/03/2002 11:41:16 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson