[Cold Heat]

That is a fine sentiment but it means nothing until you can change the priorities of the electorate. The purpose of this thread seems to me to be trying to get back to persuasion in lieu of beating those that do not agree with us into submission.

I am afraid some of our libertarian members are taking offense(as in first amendment), regarding some changes they see. I agree with one poster today who said that guiding FR is like herding cats or pushing a rope. I used to lurk way back during Clinton and I expected to see anti Clinton rants etc. I never expected to see anti-Bush threads.(this is the only words I can use to decribe them) They are critical because he is not far enough to the right.

He never represented himself as a right winger before the election. He has generally been farther to the right than I expected, yet he is criticized. I don't get it?

[nopardons]

Those are the " UNAPPEASEBLES " . Present them with a glass 1/2 full of liquid, ask thm if it is 1/2 full or 1/2 empty, and they'll tell you, with a straight face, that the glass is EMPTY . They will NEVER be satisfied.

[OldFriend]

Some have forgotten or disapprove of the fact that the man is President of ALL the people, not just us rightwingers!!!