Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Centers for Development Control"
Email - Center-Right.org ^ | 24 January, 2002 | Dave Shiflett

Posted on 01/24/2002 7:56:43 PM PST by brityank

Subject: CENTER-RIGHT, Issue 194, Jan 24, 2002
Date: 24 Jan 2002 23:49:57 -0000
From: "Center-Right"
Reply-To: center-right-feedback-103@lb.bcentral.com
To: List Member

 

CENTER-RIGHT, a free weeklyish e-newsletter of centrist, conservative, and libertarian ideas.

Issue 194, Jan 24, 2002

Over 2600 subscribers

Check out (and link to) our Web site http://www.center-right.org/ PLEASE FEEL FREE TO FORWARD THIS to anyone you think might be interested.

========================================================

"Centers for Development Control"

by Dave Shiflett, from http://www.TechCentralStation.com, Jan. 14, 2002

 

In a development watched closely by those of us who live beyond the city limits, doctors and researchers from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) issued a report insisting suburban living is hazardous to your health.

This comes as something of a surprise because the CDC not long ago issued a report saying suburbanites are the healthiest people in the nation. As a suburb dweller, I have a great deal at stake here; so I went looking for clues as to where the Truth may actually lie.

Perhaps to no surprise, it quickly became clear that one of the study's critics may be correct: This report doesn't even qualify as junk science. It's merely junk.

First off, the report was funded by a group called Sprawlwatch. Now, as the name suggests, Sprawlwatch is not neutral on the question of suburban living. Far from it. Anti-sprawl activists have many criticisms of that arrangement: People live in stand-alone homes surrounded by yards, trees, and SUV-driving Republicans. Anti-sprawl types prefer it when people live in large apartment boxes full of strangers, ride buses or subways, and adhere to a literal reading of The New York Times.

One author of this report -- Richard Jackson, identified as the CDC's top "environmental health expert" -- said the report was a result of responsible people funding a paper long overdue. More to the point, he asserted, we ignore sprawl "at our peril." Among other complaints, suburbanites are said to depend far too heavily on cars instead of bicycles and walking. By contrast, he cited yet another study showing that the average Washingtonian walks 10,000 steps a day. "You cannot do that living in a place like Orange County."

I can't speak for Orange County, which may indeed have a law against walking 10,000 steps or more per day. After all, as some of us have pointed out, once localities began outlawing public smoking we were on a very slippery slope.

But I have lived in Washington and I seriously question the notion that the average Washingtonian takes 10,000 steps a day, which after all would be close to a couple of miles. For one thing, Washington's fat cats didn't get that way by accident. The city's vast population of bureaucrats mostly drive to work, ride elevators to their offices, and thereafter prop their feet on their desks till closing.

Mr. Jackson raises further suspicions by complaining that the CDC's earlier report -- the one stating that suburbanites are the healthiest Americans -- was, in the words of the Los Angeles Times, "skewed by the many affluent people in the suburbs with access to top health insurance, gym memberships and homes near bike trail networks." Which is to say, skewed by the type of people who live in the suburbs -- and who are the proper subject of such a study. One senses a bit of class warfare may be underway, which perhaps explains the supposed cure for this offense against health: "high-density developments with a mix of homes, stores and office space that allow for fully integrated, racially and economically diverse walkable communities."

Mr. Jackson humbly admits that his report "is not yet a smoking gun. It is a policy piece. We're putting forward hypotheses and thinking about how these things contribute to the public health." He also does some Oprah-jabber: "We are designing environments that actually restrict people's options. We need to be offering people options to take charge of their health." In other words, this is supposedly about "empowerment."

Yet it is fairly clear that anti-suburban attacks are designed to pack larger numbers of people into smaller spaces and, indeed, greatly reduce suburban living as an option. Some anti-sprawl types take their arguments to extremes. The other day I read an article arguing that that non-density housing is perfect for wife-beaters and child abusers because their victims' screams cannot be heard by neighbors.

As mentioned above, one critic of this new report denounces it as mere junk, but the fact is these types of "studies" have a more serious aim. By saying that suburban living is not simply a lifestyle choice but is injurious to health, activists bring to mind the mantra that gun deaths represent a "disease" -- indeed an epidemic.

According to this analysis, opposing the proffered "cure" is morally indefensible, for after all we are talking about combating "disease." And so modulating human behavior is less a political concern -- reached through consent and constitutional process -- than an endeavor of medical "science."

Out here in the suburbs, we're watching these developments very closely. We have our many faults, but we can smell BS a country mile away.

=========

CENTER-RIGHT is edited by Eugene Volokh, who teaches constitutional law, copyright law, and a seminar on firearms regulation at UCLA Law School ( http://www.law.ucla.edu/faculty/volokh), and is organized with the help of Terry Wynn and the Federalist Society (http://www.fed-soc.org/).

Check out (and link to) our Web site, http://www.center-right.org

_______________________________________________________________________
Powered by List Builder



TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: enviralists; green; michaeldobbs
For those who don't know Dr. Volokh, please drop in to his site at The Journalist's Guide to Gun Policy Scholars and Second Amendment Scholars and see the listings of experts that he has amassed. He also answers his email, so if you have any questions drop him a line.

I also get the distinct idea he doesn't like watermelons. :^)

1 posted on 01/24/2002 7:56:43 PM PST by brityank (brityank@FReepmail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *landgrab; *Green; *Enviralists; farmfriend; marsh2; dixiechick2000; Helen; Mama_Bear; poet...
Yet it is fairly clear that anti-suburban attacks are designed to pack larger numbers of people into smaller spaces and, indeed, greatly reduce suburban living as an option.

So, Property Rights is just not a Western Problem, soon it will be a Suburban one too.

Forewarned is forearmed.
Bang !!

2 posted on 01/24/2002 7:59:10 PM PST by brityank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
BUMP!!
3 posted on 01/24/2002 8:05:10 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Hmmm, I look forward to outhouses, heating water on on a pot belly stove, growing my own garden, horse and carriage transportation. We are fortunate that we have modern thinking people looking out for us.
4 posted on 01/24/2002 8:08:03 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Nothing like moving down-market. This was totally predictable.
5 posted on 01/24/2002 8:10:22 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brityank
this link?

-The Thoreau Institute Urban Growth and Transportation Studies--

has a lot of info & opinion refuting the "urban sprawl," "Lite rail/mass transit" and related items...

And more here:

-Independence Institute--"Rights" Research

6 posted on 01/25/2002 1:32:02 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Looking at the initiation source group who sponsors this thinking, I just say ...........

7 posted on 01/25/2002 7:19:56 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: poet
"We are fortunate..." lol...bttt.

I know I want my soylent green smoke-free. ;^)

8 posted on 01/25/2002 7:34:02 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AMDG&BVMH; brityank; farmfriend
AMDG&BVMH, this article proves that the evil enviral Nazis are not just after farmers, ranchers, loggers and those who live in rural areas.

They hate the Americans who dare to live in surburban areas. Surprise, they will use lies to create a cover for surbuban cleansing.

If you are not on Brityank's and farmfriend's ping list, you might want to request to be on their enviral ping list.

9 posted on 01/25/2002 8:07:40 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Bttt!
10 posted on 01/25/2002 9:10:17 AM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
You're right. We need the Federal Government to be in charge of our health care, and, of course, our health. Those of us who desire freedom and self-determination.....what in the world were we thinking???
11 posted on 01/25/2002 12:08:04 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
>"CENTER-RIGHT, a free weeklyish e-newsletter of centrist, conservative, and libertarian ideas."

What?!

Centrist, conservative and libertarian?!

Get out!

That's like some girl saying that she's a Christian, a virgin, and a hooker...

Mark W.

12 posted on 01/25/2002 12:14:47 PM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
If people were animals, it would be illegal to move them into the big city’s crime and death-ridden neighborhoods.
13 posted on 01/25/2002 12:20:23 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; brityank; farmfriend
Thanks for the ping. I am concerned about rural America. They have been cleansed for so long, they have lost the political clout that goes with numbers/votes. I have a feeling suburbanites will vote in their self-interest. ;) However, this "study" is clearly an abuse of government funding, etc.
14 posted on 01/26/2002 3:49:33 AM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson