Posted on 01/21/2002 3:10:55 AM PST by Mia T
01-17-02
JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 M HIDDEN SUBPOENAED CLINTON-GORE E-MAIL
FILEGATE, CHINAGATE--EVEN ENRONGATE--TREASURE TROVE COST TAXPAYERS OVER $12 M TO RECOVER
|
JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAIL Judicial Watch e-mail | January 17, 2002 | JW GOVERNMENT ADMITS 1.8 MILLION E-MAIL FOUND AS A RESULT OF JUDICIAL WATCH'S EXPOSING HIDDEN CLINTON-GORE E-MAIL ˆ RESTORED AT A COST OF OVER $12 MILLION E-MAILGATE UPDATE (Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that the government, in a court filing January 9, 2002, has admitted that it found 1,844,242 e-mail from the Clinton-Gore White House. This e-mail has never been searched in response to subpoenas and documents requests from Judicial Watch, Congress, and independent counsels. The e-mail were restored at a cost to taxpayers thus far of $12,066,346. The e-mail, which is in the custody of the National Archives, must now be searched pursuant to court orders. Judicial Watch, which is prosecuting the Filegate $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were misused by the Clinton White House, first exposed the e-mail scandal in early 2000 through its client Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas. Another Judicial Watch client, former White House computer contractor Betty Lambuth, also testified (along with others) that high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing. These threats occurred in the middle of the Lewinsky scandal. The scandal was the subject of a months long evidentiary hearing that included the testimony of the late Charles Ruff, John Podesta, and Cheryl Mills. The court is in now considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings. A decision is expected soon. „If not for Judicial Watch‚s heroic clients, this e-mail would have been lost forever. We are confident that the e-mail contains a treasure trove of information concerning Filegate, Chinagate, and, yes, even Enrongate. Any incriminating e-mail will be part of renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail,‰ stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman. |
These rats will roam free and die a natural death (see #40 above). I'll bet anyone dollars to doughnuts on this, as long as they are Krispie Kreme.
(Luis, you of course, will approve my personal friend and attorney coming on the air on a three-way hookup, correct??)
We are confident that the e-mail contains a treasure trove of information
concerning Filegate, Chinagate, and, yes, even Enrongate.
Any incriminating e-mail will be part of
renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail,
stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
BTTT!
Not that it isn't a tempting and enticing thought. And not that he doesn't deserve it. I don't mean this to sound like a defense of the man, I detest him down to the very protons, electrons and neutrons of the atoms that make up his bone marrow.
BUT IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! He will not get the judgment that he so richly deserves until he's standing at the white throne with the rest of us someday. We need to accept that and deal with it and move on.
It's over. He's over. He beat us like a drum and played us like marionettes on a string for eight years. Give Satan his due. Bill Clinton is one of the five greatest practitioners of the art of politics in America in the 20th century, along with FDR, Reagan, Nixon and George Wallace. I'm not talking about any policies those people advocated or whether they were right or wrong or whether I like them, I'm talking strictly about practicing the art of politics.
But again, as of Jan. 20, 2001, BILL CLINTON WAS RENDERED IRRELEVANT, and we make him relevant by continuing to be obsessed by him. Let him go. God will deal with him someday, plus 200 years down the road if this country's still here, history will deal with him by having the word "impeachment" attached to his name forevermore, plus his administration will be rated about as highly as the Millard Fillmore and Chester A. Arthur administrations.
Plus we have as good a president as we could hope to have in there right now ... he's not perfect, no politician is ... and he's riding high right now and he's undoing the garbage of the Clinton years and we need to look forward with him and not backward.
I'm sorry, I'm putting my physical and mental energy into getting the Senate back and securing the House in November and putting G.W. in good shape for 2004, and am not going to sit around wasting brain cells worrying about the pipe dream of Bill Clinton going to jail.
|
It would be foolhardy to confuse 'vulgar' with 'irrelevant.' The clintons are vulgar, common, vacuous, small...but as long as they still wield power, they are not irrelevant... |
Backed by his adviser (and former Clinton Treasury Secretary) Robert Rubin, Daschle claims that George W. Bush's tax cuts of spring 2001 are responsible for a budgetary swing from surplus to deficit. This is essentially nonsense... |
|
by Mia T, 01-10-02 While this fiasco of a presidential debut is certainly not the first indication of Daschle's "dimness," the "Daschle scheme" may not be as ill-conceived as it first appears. The assumption being made--incorrectly, in my view--is that Daschle hatched the plan...or, at a minimum, supports it. But the following bits of circumstantial evidence suggest otherwise:
|
Had George Will written Sleaze, the sequel (the "sequel" is, of course, hillary) after 9-11-01, I suspect that he would have had to forgo the above conceit, as the doubt expressed in the setup phrase was, from that day forward, no longer operational. Indeed, assessing the clinton presidency an abject failure is not inconsistent with commentary coming from the left, most recently the LA Times: "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize." When the clintons left office, I predicted that the country would eventually learn--sadly, the hard way--that this depraved, self-absorbed and inept pair had placed America (and the world) in mortal danger. But I was thinking years, not months. It is very significant that hillary clinton didn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. (Meet the Press, 12-09-01), notwithstanding tired tactics (if you can't pass the buck, spread the blame) and chronic "KnowNothing Victim Clinton" self-exclusion. If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down in perpetuity, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years. And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists. It is critically important that hillary clinton fail in her grasp for power; read Peggy Noonan's little book, 'The Case Against Hillary Clinton' and Barbara Olson's two books; it is critical that the West de-clintonize, but that will be automatic once it is understood that the clintons risked civilization itself in order to gain and retain power. It shouldn't take books, however, to see that a leader is a dangerous, self-absorbed sicko. People should be able to figure that out for themselves. The electorate must be taught to think, to reason. It must be able to spot spin, especially in this age of the electronic demagogue. I am not hopeful. As Bertrand Russell noted, "Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. " *George Will continues: There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism
|
P.S. I've read enough around here to know and appreciate many of Mia's post. She puts a great deal of work into her research and I'd suggest if you don't like it, and or the graphics you can always find another thread to post your brilliant opinions.
yoe During a federal court hearing on the e-mail scandal, Silbert suffered a memory loss about his contacts with the Clinton-Gore White House concerning the e-mail scandal. Silbert is now subject to a pending motion by the public interest law firm Judicial Watch to have him held in contempt of court.
"The fact that characters like Robert Bennett and Earl Silbert are now working with the Enron gang speaks volumes. Ken Lay and Enron might as well have hired Mafia lawyers for their defense. Bennett's and Silbert's association with Enron further confirm the scandal's deep connection to the Clintonites," stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
It came in this noon from - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/612728/posts
yoe During a federal court hearing on the e-mail scandal, Silbert suffered a memory loss about his contacts with the Clinton-Gore White House concerning the e-mail scandal. Silbert is now subject to a pending motion by the public interest law firm Judicial Watch to have him held in contempt of court.
"The fact that characters like Robert Bennett and Earl Silbert are now working with the Enron gang speaks volumes. Ken Lay and Enron might as well have hired Mafia lawyers for their defense. Bennett's and Silbert's association with Enron further confirm the scandal's deep connection to the Clintonites," stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
It came in this noon from - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/612728/posts
I'm walking sort of club-footed myself!
"P.S. I've read enough around here to know and appreciate many of Mia's post..."
As have I...
"She puts a great deal of work into her research..."
Agree. Note #41 (prior to your joining the thread)
..."and I'd suggest if you don't like it, and or the graphics you can always find another thread to post your brilliant opinions."
Your "suggestion" has already been noted.
"Brilliant"?... Well, thank you! But I think there are others who derserve of your high praise. (see #60)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
