Well, it is obvious that you are a typical catholic: ignorant of the Bible and your own "tradition", you refuse to comprehend clear, specific contradictions between your cult's man made "tradition" and the Bible and your response to such is unproveable generalities.
Here is what Christians call the Roman Road, bascially the Gods' plan of salvation, please read it until you comprehend it.
ROMANS 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
ROMANS 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
ROMANS 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
ROMANS 6:23 For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
ROMANS 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
ROMANS 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
ROMANS 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
ROMANS 10:11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
ROMANS 10:12 ¶ For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
ROMANS 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Well, Sir, it is obvious that you read your prejudices into everything you read, including the Catechism, and that if I or another other "typical Catholic" were to say, No, That is NOT what we believe,that is not what the words say, you sneer and say, "O yes, you do, because that is what
I read and
I am inspired by the Holy Ghost. No, I will go beyond this ans suggest that you have deluded yoursel into thinking that
you, personally, have talked with the resurrected Jesus, like the Apostle Paul. Someone who like--for instance-- Krister Stendahl(no RC) who approaches the "Roman Road" without thinking that Paul was either a Lutheran Pietist or an American revivalist may reasonably conclude that this is a very selective reading of Paul. But than Stendahl did not have the advantage of having someone highlight this part of Scripture and assure him that only this construction is possible. Do you really believe this is Jesus? Could not some human voice have lead you alone this path?