Well, Sir, it is obvious that you read your prejudices into everything you read, including the Catechism, and that if I or another other "typical Catholic" were to say, No, That is NOT what we believe,that is not what the words say, you sneer and say, "O yes, you do, because that is what
I read and
I am inspired by the Holy Ghost. No, I will go beyond this ans suggest that you have deluded yoursel into thinking that
you, personally, have talked with the resurrected Jesus, like the Apostle Paul. Someone who like--for instance-- Krister Stendahl(no RC) who approaches the "Roman Road" without thinking that Paul was either a Lutheran Pietist or an American revivalist may reasonably conclude that this is a very selective reading of Paul. But than Stendahl did not have the advantage of having someone highlight this part of Scripture and assure him that only this construction is possible. Do you really believe this is Jesus? Could not some human voice have lead you alone this path?
Look I showed you the definitions for the words of what your catechism says about J2P2 and your college of cardinals being possessed, if you don't agree or like it DON'T WHINE at me, take it with the folks in rome.
Bottom line "Words mean what they mean", your little rant is just figuratively sticking your fingers in your ears because you're afraid of the truth.
Bye!