Skip to comments.
California Energy Crisis to Cost $71 Bln, Group Says
Bloomberg News ^
| Jan. 17
| Daniel Taub
Posted on 01/17/2002 5:37:18 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 07/19/2004 2:09:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Santa Monica, California, Jan. 17 (Bloomberg) -- California's power-deregulation plan, which left the state's two largest utilities insolvent, will end up costing the state about $71 billion, or $2,100 for each resident, a consumer group said.
The costs include $11.3 billion from the state treasury to buy power on behalf of utilities owned by PG&E Corp., Edison International and Sempra Energy, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said in a study released today. Those costs will rise to $19 billion when interest is added, the group said.
(Excerpt) Read more at quote.bloomberg.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: calpowercrisis; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Hello we have a number!!!
$71 Billion!
Whoops, I don't know if I can believe ole Harvey and his Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights !
To: Calpowercrisis;randita;SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; quimby...
To find all articles tagged or indexed using
calpowercrisisClick here: calpowercrisis
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
el bumpo!
3
posted on
01/17/2002 5:40:26 PM PST
by
ken21
To: ken21;45Auto;doctor noe;
Thanks for the bump!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
$2,100 for each resident There goes your Federal tax cuts, Californians.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Rather, power producers withheld power to drive up prices, the group said.
Those evil corporations! When the revolution comes, I hope they're the first against the wall, man. When will we learn? The market simply doesn't work!
We just need to learn to share, damn it.
6
posted on
01/17/2002 5:46:02 PM PST
by
Asclepius
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The government set price controls, and forced the utilities to sell electricity for a lower price than what they paid for it. This "buy high sell low" policy would cause any buisness to go bankrupt. These price controls, combined with a ban on the construction of any new major power plants for over a decade, plus a ban on long term contracts for the whoselsale purchase of electricity by private utilities, is what liberals, in their doublespeak, refer to as "deregulation."
7
posted on
01/17/2002 5:46:14 PM PST
by
grundle
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's a foregone conclusion what the CA's exit strategy will be, even if they haven't fathomed it as of yet.
Merely do what it has naturally conditioned itself to do . . .
Default on the debt. Decry the Evile Texan and refuse the debt.
Or simply move the debt to a series of partnerships. Hey! It's within Generally Accepted California Accounting Principles!
Or load up the rich.
8
posted on
01/17/2002 5:58:46 PM PST
by
holman
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Sounds like your taxes are going up, CA.
To: Major Matt Mason
Thats close to Enron's Net Worth at its High
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
PG&E's Pacific Gas & Electric and Edison's Southern California Edison became insolvent buying power for more than state law allowed them to charge customers. With rules like that in place, no wonder Kalifornia is not the preferred business climate.
BTW, the power utility here wants a 20 - 25% increase in rates - to, "make up for the high cost of last summers prices."
Fight is on!
LVM
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Whoops, I don't know if I can believe ole Harvey and his Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights !You can believe harvey as much as you can believe any socialist.
12
posted on
01/17/2002 6:34:28 PM PST
by
quimby
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Did i miss it or did the article fail to mention the name of harvey's group ? (It may be TURN). Seems like after using the group for a sensational headline, the least the author could do would be to mention the name of the group.
13
posted on
01/17/2002 6:38:04 PM PST
by
quimby
To: quimby
Woops, found the name. Sorry for the post.
14
posted on
01/17/2002 6:39:41 PM PST
by
quimby
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The high cost of a grossly flawed "deregulation" scam......
To: LasVegasMac
With rules like that in place, no wonder Kalifornia is not the preferred business climate.Given the fact that California is the 5th largest economy or Earth, up from 6th last year, I don't think we are hurting from lack of business.
However, to tell you the truth I wish there were a lot less business, which would mean less people. Maybe we can send some your way, that is if they don't mind the heat in Vegas. I personally don't like living like a lizard.
To: lewislynn
The high cost of a grossly flawed "deregulation" scam......On that, we agree!!!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"The foundation has said that it may use a ballot initiative to try to solve some of the problems caused by deregulation." Harvey and the state of California are going to repeal the law of supply and demand, by golly.
18
posted on
01/17/2002 6:57:08 PM PST
by
okie01
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
On that, we agree!!!!! Thank you!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Harvey Rosenfield has no credibility; but then again, when it comes to leadership, neither does Gray Davis.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson