[Arkle]

So what's your point? All I'm saying is, regardless of the liberal agenda the FAS has, if you can find a better, more comprehensive site for details of weapons systems than this, then I'd like to know about it.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

I guess he's still spinning tales for the folks back home.
One of Robertson County's own making a difference
It's one thing not having a degree, it's quite another to lie and say you have one.

[r9etb]

I'm saying is, regardless of the liberal agenda the FAS has, if you can find a better, more comprehensive site for details of weapons systems than this, then I'd like to know about it.

They're right about a lot, but not everything -- especially in the "forum" parts.

[KC_for_Freedom]

No one is saying they are not comprehensive, what they have is a bias. They believe we spend too much on defense, and that the US does not have any enemies (except those we make with our mistaken policies). These "scientists" have expertise in their fields, but they publish something and it gets used to make a dis-armament arguement. It is muchlike bonefied scientists reporting on the environment only to have a "leftist" take the data and show that the sky is falling or the earth is warming and its all our fault.

Beware that these scientists may not have the latest classified data and that the programs that they think may not work may in fact be showing better performanc than they realize.