[Theophrastus]

No he in reply to O'Reilly basically saying that owning slaves was no big deal that it was not acceptable and asked if O'Reilly would be as blase about the holocaust.

Comparing injustices to minorities is not comparing Washington to Hitler. I thought he was a lunatic but let's not twist the context of what was said.

[sinkspur]

No he in reply to O'Reilly basically saying that owning slaves was no big deal that it was not acceptable and asked if O'Reilly would be as blase about the holocaust.

I've got a vapor lock over your post.

I heard the guy say that owning slaves was WORSE than the Holocaust.

He NEVER said it was no big deal.

What were you listening to?

[Diva Betsy Ross]

IMHO A comparasion is a comparasion. He brought up Hitler's name in refrence to his response to O'Reilly's remark about Washinton. O'Reilly says " So what that GW owned slaves"... Then the racist says, "would you say so what to the jews who were killed by Hitler". O'Reilly asks about the blacks who owned slaves and of course the racist does not say a word about Hitler then.

The pattern of thought shows that he believes the two share something.

I would love to hear what that racist would have to say about America after living as a black man in Africa. Too bad we can't find out.