Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
The People's Republic of Massachusetts does not recognize self defense as a legal defense.
3 posted on 01/11/2002 8:51:26 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sheik yerbouty
When I was listening to Savage's rantings last night on the drive home. He disclosed the victim's past and only because a reporter from Newsweek (I think) had been in his studio doing a story on him (Savage) and the reporter disclosed this info. It seemed from what I heard that the victim was the type of guy who spoiled for fights as a rule as well as came from a family in which this type of behavior was not uncommon. On the other hand ....does this matter? I know in rape cases it is verboten and the court's have ruled that a rape victim's past is irrelevant...rightly so in my opinion with rare exceptions. However..if a guy with a history of fighting is killed in a fight by a guy who has no history of this at all (that I know of) then it does raise my eyebrows...particularly in light of the fact that he's facing a 20 year bit. Could the prosecutrix be looking for a notch in her belt here? I'm simply not sure but it does raise questions to me.
7 posted on 01/11/2002 8:58:52 AM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sheik yerbouty
I see this case as one of whether the correct amount of self defense was used (if it was indeed determined to be self defense), i.e. did the defendant just throw a few too many punches or did he stop as soon as the other guy was obviously in retreat or unable to defend himself.
22 posted on 01/11/2002 9:18:02 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson