Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ENRON SCANDAL THAT NEVER WAS
1 FELLOW FREEPER ^ | 1/11/2002 | 1 FELLOW FREEPER

Posted on 01/11/2002 8:14:33 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER

All this hullabaloo about an Enron scandal in the Bush White House has got to be the DUMBEST thing I have read in my 47 years on earth. I am an investor in the stock market who reads and watches every worthwhils bit of information every day on the market. I am here to tell you that not one reputable Wall Street analyst was aware of Enron's real troubles.It is at least ostensible that Enron "cooked the books", and now the corporate accountants have admitted to shredding many documents. Now, if not one person on Wall Street knew anything , how in the name of God was President Bush expected to know anything about this?


TOPICS: Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Dog Gone
Henry Waxman (creep from hell) - grasping at straws.
21 posted on 01/11/2002 8:34:33 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The left may not want it to come out, but it will only because a handfull of Bush hating left wingers fell for this Trojan Horse !!!!!
22 posted on 01/11/2002 8:34:41 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pete
So, Leiberman is investigating a company who owes his biggest contributor $3 billion

Lieberman is also investigating a company (Enron) that contributed to his OWN campaign. He should recuse himself just as Ashcroft did.

23 posted on 01/11/2002 8:35:08 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
Here's my take. Thoughtful responses welcome.

From a poster on a financial forum:

ANDERSON, ETC.

Just speculation, but I think it will become public knowledge that:

-- off balance sheet transactions are common
-- they have been set up to hide debt and maximize income and minimize expense on the PUBLIC financials
-- the consulting wings of the Big 10 accounting firms DESIGN the vehicles in ways that enable the auditing wings to IGNORE the off-balance sheet transactions
-- the big fees paid to the consulting wings are the equivalent of "silence money"
-- reform in accounting standards etc has been slow because the auditing firms are benefitting too much from the present fraudulent arrangements
-- complicity in this extends to major international banks who step up to the plate to fund these deals, in exchange for HUGE returns
-- large political contributions of the firms in question buy them immunity from regulatory oversight

In principle, I don't think there is anything all that NEW about what is going on. But the pervasiveness is still yet to be understood. Maybe it will not, however, because there are a lot of people with investments in the continuation of the status quo.

My response:

Fine. So loopholes exist and have for a long time. As you said this is nothing new. Why waste bandwidth with nonnews? If anyone can contribute real news, it would be insight into the process by which ENE was downgraded to junk. ENE was still profitable and operating as an important trader before they were downgraded. Who decided to put them out of business? Ratings friends of Gray Davis?

I do not know of any business where the players are as pure as newly fallen snow so I can't join a rag on Ken Lay this and Ken Lay that. But if I was Ken Lay's and ENE's enemy, I would analyze where the weak points are. One weakness I would note would be a short loan position with insufficient cash. Then I would determine the conditions by which those loans could be called sooner. I would also assess ENE's financial backing such as J.P. Morgan Chase to understand whether they were in a position to rescue ENE from the loan calls.

I believe Ken Lay and ENE were targeted because Ken Lay (like the Vichy in WWII France) would side with whoever was in power at the time and because he participated in the California energy squeeze. He called the White House for help when he saw it coming and they turned him down, not wanting to get involved in a scandal.

There are real victims from all this, but I don't think Ken Lay and ENE are the culprits. There are others behind the scenes that engineered this tragedy.

24 posted on 01/11/2002 8:35:19 AM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
The one question I have on this whole mess is, if the money given to political candidates did not influence them in any way, why are so many, including the Attorney General, recusing themselves from the investigation?

Sure, it's to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. If they are recusing themselves now, did they look the other way before all of this mess too? There was legislation legislation favorable to Enron passed that lead to the company being able to freeze the 401k's of their employees. What else was done?

Sure the administration is saying they did not intervene at the end of the company's existance, but then it was too late. Seems that their political connections on both sides helped them to create an enviroment where it was much easier to 'cook the books' and do whatever other unethical practices they wished, free from scrutiny.

25 posted on 01/11/2002 8:35:38 AM PST by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
Dems are totally operating on the theory if we say he was involved long enough some people will think he was. Regardless of the facts.
26 posted on 01/11/2002 8:35:57 AM PST by jrobb20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
The real questions are:

Did the Pres, VP, Lieberman, etc.. or any of the other multi millionaire
politicians benefit from "Inside" information and sell 10's of 1000's of shares
of Enron before the stock went to the bottom..???
Did they know something from the inside..??
28 posted on 01/11/2002 8:37:20 AM PST by freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
These accounting procedures could not hide the fraud forever. Do you think the Enron Execs would have made more money from a bailout, or riding the ponzi scam down?
29 posted on 01/11/2002 8:37:34 AM PST by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Rush kept saying yesterday to the Dems "Be careful what you go after. You never know what else may turn up." I am sure he knows there is much more damage to the Dems to be had in this whole issue and no wrongdoing on the Bush front.
30 posted on 01/11/2002 8:39:00 AM PST by jrobb20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz
""The one question I have on this whole mess is, if the money given to political candidates did not influence them in any way, why are so many, including the Attorney General, recusing themselves from the investigation?

Also, they are leading the brain dead left wingers to believe that something may be wrong. Waxman is a moron and jumped first.
31 posted on 01/11/2002 8:39:27 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Excellent point, Dog Gone. Rush is on now talking about Henry Waxman is angry that President Bush DIDN'T do anything to help Enron and thus, the little people, have suffered through his neglect. If it wasn't so sad it would be funny. The Dems can't even figure out what to be angry about!! Most Dems are figuring President Bush did something illegal by getting involved in Enron's downfall and then there's Waxman - angry that President Bush didn't get involved and help out. Jeez.
32 posted on 01/11/2002 8:39:29 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Most Dems are figuring President Bush did something illegal by getting involved in Enron's downfall and then there's Waxman - angry that President Bush didn't get involved and help out. Jeez.

I am waiting for them to suggest the government bail out the little people, oh and while they are at it, they will bail out the creditors (NY banks) who lost their money.

33 posted on 01/11/2002 8:41:58 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: steve50
"These accounting procedures could not hide the fraud forever. Do you think the Enron Execs would have made more money from a bailout, or riding the ponzi scam down?""

They didn't have to ride it forever, and they would never have been bailed out with their gambling, and heavy losses. "
34 posted on 01/11/2002 8:42:41 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
But it's an election year and the dims are clutching at anything.

Contributions to both parties in Congress

35 posted on 01/11/2002 8:44:10 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
As Fred Barnes stated on the same show, how exactly has the Bush White House helped or cut a break for Enron? How can Bush be accused of granting them unethical or illegal favors when he's stood by and let them crater into bankruptcy?

Exactly. The left is on a fishing expedition, desperate to topple Bush's raings. They know if a re-election were held today, he'd be re-elected by a landslide.

36 posted on 01/11/2002 8:44:25 AM PST by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Excellent point, Dog Gone. Rush is on now talking about Henry Waxman is angry that President Bush DIDN'T do anything to help Enron and thus, the little people, have suffered through his neglect.

So funny -- are the dims stretching their imaginations or what?

37 posted on 01/11/2002 8:45:51 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
They are holding on to a rope that is on fire. If any crooks are found, they will be Dems.If the left wingers weren't the real crooks and criminals,I would be worried......I AINT WORRIED!!
38 posted on 01/11/2002 8:47:44 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Also keep watch for Miss Interpretate--registered today, 1-11-02.
39 posted on 01/11/2002 8:48:52 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Thanks annie...lol
40 posted on 01/11/2002 8:49:37 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson