Posted on 01/09/2002 11:20:27 PM PST by davidosborne
I invite you all to sign the following petition..
Please add your signature to this petition supporting John Ashcroft's work to end terrorism! The ACLJ will deliver this document to John Ashcroft, President George W. Bush and all members of the United States Senate.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN PETITION.....
I think the "compromise" to not prosecute Mr. Clinton, was simply to close the books on him, and not give him any UNDESERVED press...
I think President Bush, and John Ashcroft make an OUTSTANDING team! I support them BOTH 100%...
UP from 12848 when this thread started.... Keep em comming FReepers !!!
David
Johnny makes his own rules as he goes and as some powers require him to. He did it as Gov. of Mo. Here's a brief write up on his method, Use Google and go from there if you really want to learn about Johnny, with terms like "Ashcroft MoDot HighRoad" And also "Margaret Kelly MoDot" -- BTW, because Mrs. Kelly (R), as Mo. State Auditor, brought to light a LOT of wrongdoing/irregularities that occurred under Johnny, he would NOT endorse her for Gov. when she ran, in effect giving the Governorship to Mel Carnahan (Alive at the time). Then he wouldn't contest the St.Louis and K.C. election fraud and gave the Senate seat to him as a Dead Body. But he got his rise in position, didn't he? Here ya go -----
"In 1992, the city of Branson--a tourism mecca visited annually by millions who attend the country-music halls there--was burdened by traffic congestion. Thirty thousand cars a day were jamming the town's Country Music Boulevard in peak season. Ashcroft declared the situation in the Ozarks an "economic emergency" in order to build a road. This was the first time this gubernatorial power had been used to facilitate construction of a highway, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Ashcroft's declaration opened the way for the quick approval of a $140 million, eighteen-mile bypass promoted as the solution to Branson's traffic mess--a claim challenged by some locals, who blasted the Ozark Mountain Highroad as an "Ashcroft pork-barrel" project. But there is no question that the new highway was beneficial to several key political contributors to Ashcroft, most notably Peter Herschend, an owner of the Silver Dollar City amusement center. The road--US Highway 465--would skirt Branson and swing by Herschend's Silver Dollar City, making it easier for tourists to reach the site of shops, variety shows and rides. A Post-Dispatch analysis of land records found that the Herschend family stood to gain the most from the project. The proposed road would cross three stretches of Herschend-owned property, and in 1993 the family sold one of them to the state for $2.2 million. Locals called the road "Pete's Pike."
..."One did not have to be a partisan Democrat to wonder if Ashcroft's support for the project was enhanced by his relationship with Herschend. In October 1994, as Ashcroft was campaigning for the Senate, the Post-Dispatch reported that Herschend, his wife and business had donated $12,000 to Ashcroft campaigns in the previous ten years and that Herschend had hosted fundraisers for Ashcroft. According to subsequent federal elections records, Herschend and his family contributed $18,000 to Ashcroft's 1994 Senate effort and $7,000 to the Republican Party that campaign cycle. (Herschend's son, Chris, worked on Ashcroft's campaign staff in 1994.) According to Herschend, the road grew out of conversations he held with Ashcroft and highway officials in 1991 and 1992. And when Ashcroft declared the "economic emergency" at a public meeting in Branson in June 1992--just months before he was to leave office--he was introduced by Herschend. At that time, Ashcroft said the highway would be finished by 1998 and reduce traffic congestion in downtown Branson. (The road is still under construction and years away from completion; two years after the announcement, studies showed the road would draw off only a small amount of Branson's traffic.) Some local businesses favored the highway, environmentalists opposed it (the road would run through the habitat of endangered birds), and other opponents maintained that a costly project of unproven effectiveness was being rushed over their objections. But the US Department of Transportation approved it in February 1993. When the Post-Dispatch asked Herschend about the project a year-and-a-half later--the last time this story received any serious attention--the businessman said that when he was lobbying Ashcroft for the road he didn't know the bypass was going to run through his property. But the newspaper discovered two maps drawn up before the official announcement that showed the proposed road passing through or near Herschend's land. The 117 acres the state purchased from Herschend for $2.2 million was to be used for building an interchange that would handle traffic to Herschend's Silver Dollar City.
"Ashcroft told the paper that he backed the road to assist Missourians not the Herschends. Nevertheless, the Herschends appeared appreciative. After 1994, Herschend, his family, and his business donated $33,000 to Ashcroft and about $40,000 to other Republicans. Perhaps Ashcroft resorted to unusual means to push this road because he truly believed it was in the public interest. But the deep involvement of an Ashcroft donor/fundraiser in the project caused the Post-Dispatch to question Ashcroft's integrity. In an editorial the newspaper asked, "Did the Ozark Mountain Highroad--US Highway 465--get special priority and favorable treatment because at least two of the landowners along the proposed right of way were campaign contributors of then-Gov. John Ashcroft?" The newspaper noted that Ashcroft's designation of the highway as an "economic emergency" had "no meaning under law" and "raises serious questions of public policy." It added that the "apparent connections between contributions to politicians and the priority given this highway at least raises doubts about safeguarding the public interest."...This was all the more reason, the paper said, for campaign finance reform. In general, politicians of unquestionable integrity do not behave in a manner that provides ammunition to advocates of campaign finance reform. But here was one instance when Ashcroft acted in a fashion that led observers to suspect he is not as honest as he is pious. --DAVID CORN & DAN MOLDEA , 1/16/01
That would have been a true victory..
You also don't seem to understand the "Patriot Act". Your defenses FOR Ashcroft tend to be Party Spiel all the way, not thoughtful assessment.
FReegards,
David
David
UP from 12848 when this thread started.... Keep em comming FReepers !!!
On the contrary -- a decision to lie back and not bother to do your job is a lot easier than a decision to actually get off your butt and buckle down.
Since I can't find any of my "signatures" for Bill, Hillary, Osama, Saddam, etc, this petition isn't any good.
Now, that MoveOn.com petition in support of Clinton -- that was a great one! ;-)
On the contrary; many people have denounced the "Patriot" Act for that reason.
Threads like this will attract the druggies who want their pot and smoke it, too. Blind to everything else, they are their own fate.
The sole purpose of the fed is "to secure these rights". The military is a tool used toward that end. The tool cannot be more important than the object it was created for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.