Skip to comments.
Say Yes! to Presidential Trade Authority!
Email ^
 | Jack Oliver, Deputy Chairman, RNC" <eLeader@mail.echampions2000.com>
Posted on 01/09/2002 3:13:53 AM PST by Neets
  
   | "Jack Oliver, Deputy Chairman, RNC" <eLeader@mail.echampions2000.com> | 
 
 
  
   | To: |  | "Oneidam" <oneidam@yahoo.com> | 
 
 
  
   | 
Dear Republican,
 
 As a member of the eChampions network, your work on behalf of the President
 and promoting his Republican agenda is invaluable. That's why I'm asking for
 your help to promote the Presidential Trade Authority legislation. This bill
 will give President Bush the necessary tools to get the economy back on
 track.
 Please read the information below and sign the petition.
 
 
 Sincerely,
 Jack Oliver
 Deputy Chairman, RNC
 
 ***************************************************
 
 Say "Yes!" to Presidential Trade Authority!
 
 Recently, the House of Representatives took a historic step towards giving
 President Bush the tools he needs to help jumpstart our economy and help the
 thousands of Americans who have lost their jobs. The House passed
 Presidential Trade Promotion Authority by a single vote. While TPA is clearly
 in the best interest of American workers and businesses, for several Members
 of Congress this was an extremely tough vote for them to cast. These leaders
 showed incredible courage in voting for increased free trade and to support
 President Bush.
 
 Follow this link to sign the petition, and show your support.
 http://www.progressforamerica.com/1101/petition.jsp?trade=true.
 
 It is very important that we support our elected officials when they rise
 above personal politics and pass legislation that will benefit all Americans
 now and for years to come.
 
 ***************************************************
 Paid for by The Republican National Committee.
 
 To become a GOP Team Leader,
 http://www.gopteamleader.com/Signup.asp
 | 
 
TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
    
1
posted on 
01/09/2002 3:13:53 AM PST
by 
Neets
 
To: OneidaM
    Hmmm..I don't know. My only fear is that this may give the Executive Branch more power than it should have. Remember, this sort of thing WILL eventually be used by a Democrat when one gets into the Oval Office again. 
 
 Also, how much power does this give the President in regards to globalization. Is he allowed to go over everyones head when it comes time to weaken our national sovreignty?
2
posted on 
01/09/2002 3:18:16 AM PST
by 
WyldKard
 
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: WyldKard
    This "Trade promotion authority" or what used to be known as Fastrack is nothing more than an abridgement to our democracy. It gives the president an all or nothing deal on trade treaties - more than likely it will be all. It will undermine labor, environmental, and social controls over corporations, bastions of unaccountable private power as witnessed by the successful coup staged by the Republican party in the last election which gets the lion's share of corporate contributions. All we need now is an undemocratically installed president to wipe away more democratic controls. Trade liberalism has failed as an ideology as much as communism has.
4
posted on 
01/09/2002 3:28:11 AM PST
by 
Plebian
 
To: OneidaM
    "Paid for by The Republican National Committee."
 OM, "Two wings on the same bird of prey". The Democratic Leadership Council has been lobbying mightily for this bill to pass. And, the Clintonite {when it comes to "free" trade agreements} George W. Bush will sign it in a New York Minuts, and embrace Hillary clinton afterward. Peace and love, George.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
    This is great that everyone on this thread so far gets it.
I was afraid when I saw the title that people were going to scramble to give Bush the same power we feared in x42.
To: KC Conspirator
    Your thoughts?
To: wienerdog.com
    "This is great that everyone on this thread so far gets it. 
 I was afraid when I saw the title that people were going to scramble to give Bush the same power we feared in x42." 
 Mega dittos. Even if Bush is a saint [not], why put more power in the hands of the executive. That power belongs to Congress.
8
posted on 
01/09/2002 4:55:33 AM PST
by 
Badray
 
To: wienerdog.com
    Usually when I get e-mail from them I support their views. This time I cannot. This is a total abrigdement of Constitutional process.
9
posted on 
01/09/2002 5:02:45 AM PST
by 
raybbr
 
To: wienerdog.com
    Yes, it kinda shoots down the theory of those who think ALL Freepers will blindly follow GWB into the burning fire, doesn't it??
10
posted on 
01/09/2002 5:04:32 AM PST
by 
Neets
 
To: OneidaM
    This is truly a breath of fresh air. I spent the day yesterday on a drug thread, and I was pretty depressed about how this place can be when the knees start jerking.
To: OneidaM
    NO WAY ............
12
posted on 
01/09/2002 5:07:40 AM PST
by 
RnMomof7
 
To: wienerdog.com
    Or did you mean when the jerks start kneeing???? hehehehehe
13
posted on 
01/09/2002 5:12:46 AM PST
by 
Neets
 
To: wienerdog.com; "Free" Trade; M1991; cdwright; mbb bill; Zoey; kristinn; Rebeckie; Lucky...
    BUMP!!
To: OneidaM
    Dream on. Congress, which amended the Constitution to enforce the traditional 2 term limit on the President, will never give up its constitutional balance of power on treaties. You can also throw in the line-item-veto with this.
15
posted on 
01/09/2002 5:21:25 AM PST
by 
sixmil
 
To: OneidaM; Snow Bunny, Iowa Granny
    Jack Oliver Deputy Chairman, RNC needs to read the Constitution to see what the difference is in the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch authorities. He may admire President Bush but this only furthers dictatorship in our republic. We need governors to resist this but I haven't heard a word from Gov. Guinn.
16
posted on 
01/09/2002 5:38:24 AM PST
by 
B4Ranch
 
To: KC_Conspirator
    Your thoughts?
To: OneidaM ; B4Ranch
    Thanks OneidaM for the thread and thanks B4 for the ping.
To: OneidaM
    As I understand it, Sen. Tom Daschle is not going to allow this to be voted on this year. This may be the only time I ever agree with the diminutive Dakotan.
 If GW really wants this authority, he could issue another executive order tomorrow granting this power unto himself as another tool in the "war on terrorism."
 I say if you want to be a dictator, go all the way. And then dare the people to rebel. It's happened that way in banana republics from time immemorial.
19
posted on 
01/09/2002 8:32:04 AM PST
by 
longleaf
 
To: WyldKard
    Korporate Amerika! 
 Old-fashioned statesmen are extinct.
20
posted on 
01/09/2002 10:40:11 AM PST
by 
lakey
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson