Anybody ever figure out what 'Bartcop' stands for?
Heh heh heh heh... OH, the stories I could tell right now.... :o)
But I'll be a mentlegen.....
Ta, ta.
Like a lot of FReepers, I started out as a MR fan. Then, one day, I noted a technical inconsistency in one of his points. Thinking he'd be grateful for my insight into a field that has provided me a living for almost twenty years, I was dumbfounded to find myself being called a CIA shill. From that point on, I tripled my efforts to scrutinize Rivero's stuff and realized he was an anti-American - especially w/r to the military - fanatic. I began to suspect that the inconsistencies in his writings weren't simply the mistakes or deceptions of a single person, but disjointed cracks in material that was obviously sloppily compiled from various writers. That should have been enough to damn the guy as a propagandist. But someone else pointed out that his use of syntax and vocabulary in the Kursk material (his absolute worst propaganda faux pas) was obviously translated from a foreign language even though Rivero claimed authorship. I have ten years of experience reading translated documents, especially documents translated from Chinese - and in going over the Kursk stuff and a lot of Rivero's earlier stuff... the observation was DEAD ON!
Conclusion: Rivero is a disinformation plant, in my opinion sponsored by the Chinese. He could very well be a dupe or a patsy, but I doubt it... he's too thorough and relentless w/r to ignoring and refuting the hardest fact and logic when it was shoved in his face. It's FR's biggest embarrassment that he was allowed to crap in our sandbox for as long as he did.
And now, some of your own posts to this thread are taking on a stammering quality. Have you noticed yet that you are the only one who actually cares about Rivero and this bin Laden tape thing? I think it may be time for you to look in the mirror. Seriously, give it a break.
Whoa! I've just started reading this thread, so I don't know yet if anybody has called you to account for this statement or not ... but I am!
How dare you! It's one thing to disagree with Michael, but to call him a TRAITOR is contemptible!
"Another one of Mikey’s battered victims. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem so come on and admit it."
You also go way over the line attacking Nita Nupress. You aren't fit to lick her shoes!
Boy! I just started this thread and already find out what a boob you are. If you think yourself a "strategist", I do believe you'd better go back to school and learn proper technique. You'd also do well to go back and examine the "evidence" you produce. That picture IS part of the series of pictures taken from the tape. I know for sure, because I myself examined those pictures when they first came out. Another thing, if you think "screaming" your way into a subject is effective, you need to think again. All that does is make it harder to read, and you lose the "strategy" you are TRYING for. Egads! What a boob!
Might as well, you are here.
Why don't you track Rivero down and make accusations to his face instead of doing it behind his back and on a forum where he cannot respond?
Oh, yeah, that would take some guts.