[VadeRetro]

But it is MR's style to present information and then, when people with differing opinions provide informarion, or worse, present information with facts that contradicts what MR has espoused, MR and his merry band of cohorts start in with the "government shill", "government hugger", etc, etc. The pattern was very well established - subscribe to the conspiracy worldview of MR - or be labeled part of a conspiracy dedicated to supressing the "truth".

I argued with MR about many of his theories, especially the Kursk sinking and I think the JFK crash. Your response does not address the point of my post, which the lack of any evidence for photo-faking by anybody. This charge of fakery has been trumpeted as "proven" when so far as I know it has merely been repeated several times.

[_Jim]

Your response does not address the point of my post, which the lack of any evidence for photo-faking by anybody. This charge of fakery has been trumpeted as "proven" when so far as I know it has merely been repeated several times.

1) Did you avail yourself of the opportunity to view the video when it was originally relased?

2) Have you availed yourself of the opportunity to view the Bin Laden video on the internet?

[Republican_Strategist]

That is just utter BS. 1) There is an ABC picture from the bin Laden tape and 2) There is a picture used by Rivero to call the bin Laden tape a fake. Clearly Rivero was using a manipulated picture to claim something was a lie and was refuted by the picture off of the ABC web site showing clearly it was bin Laden. All you have to do is look at the two pictures. Hey…if need be I can go through Rivero site and find further stuff that would indicate he is a fraud peddling anti-war propaganda.