Sorry, John, but this isn't even the best piece I've read this morning. Aldrich can't write, IMO. Also, he's a fed, which gives him an impossibly narrow point of view. Note his on again, off again attack on jurors which is a segue into an attack strictly on defense attorneys for voir dire. Anyone who views the judicial system outside the POV of a cop can clearly see the damage done to the system by voir dire, and it's evenly divided between allowing the guilty to go free and convicting the innocent.
It's impossible to refute his observations of Clinton's pretense at responding to terrorist attacks on us, but that's already been done to death by other writers.
I think that Gary has one little note on his flute and he's blown it over and over until it has become insufferably boring. No offense intended to you. Thanks for all the posts this morning. Good job as usual.
No offense taken, friend. Sharing our unique perspectives on the news is what this forum is all about, after all. Imagine how boring unanimous agreement on every issue would be.
Thanks for all the posts this morning.
You're more than welcome.