Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaceBeWithYou
>> Again you slander Kay Baily Hutchinson. Didn't you see where I corrected you before?<<

Where did I post this before?

Here's how the Senators from Texas voted:

Texas Kay Bailey Hutchinson [R] Perjury - GUILTY Obstruction - GUILTY

Kay also was key in pushing for the public getting to see the proceedings instead of them being kept secret.

Is that what is bothering you?

No, what bothers me is that she voted to have NOwitnesses on the Senate floor, thus guaranteeing a SHAM TRIAL. Any arguments that a trial with no witnesses isn't a sham??? HMMMM??????????????????????

Are you really a closet clinton supporter?

Those are fighting words.

A liberal or a lover of them?

Get bent.

74 posted on 01/02/2002 1:21:07 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: SerpentDove
You are the bent one.

Where do you get your venom?

Do you not understand what deposed testimony is?

To clarify Kay's position, she said that witnesses may not be neccesary that she would have to examine it. She did vote for them as the vote was 56-44(All Republicans and 1 democrat) for witnesses- deposed with options to call live witnesses to answer any and all questions not answered in the deposed testimony. There were 3 such witnesses called.

Pax Vobiscum

78 posted on 01/02/2002 2:03:24 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson